Grabowski John, Shearer James, Merrill John, Negus S Stevens
Substance Abuse Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Texas-Health Science Center at Houston, 1300 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Addict Behav. 2004 Sep;29(7):1439-64. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.06.018.
Stimulant abuse and dependence are disproportionately problematic due to the combination of legal and social issues added to the serious behavioural and biological features of the disorders. These problems are compounded by adverse consequences for families and society. Illegality and stigma multiply the consequences of use and difficulties in providing treatment. Specific behavioural interventions have been demonstrated as useful in treatment of substance use disorders (SUDs). Medications also have an important role in treatment. Effective agonist and antagonist pharmacotherapies as well as symptomatic treatments exist for opioid and nicotine dependence. Neither agonists nor antagonists have been approved as uniquely effective for treatment of stimulant abuse or dependence. Still, promising results are emerging for an agonist-like or 'replacement' strategy paralleling that for nicotine and opioid dependence. Supporting data have emerged from both preclinical and clinical research environments. There are scientific, clinical, social, and legal impediments to application of an agonist-like approach to stimulant abuse and dependence. Some resemble past and current concerns about opioid replacement. Others are unique to the stimulant agents, effects, and clinical features. Here, the authors consider (1) agonist and antagonist pharmacotherapy strategies; (2) preclinical research, including methodological approaches, opioid and nicotine replacement, and agonists for stimulant dependence; (3) clinical reports with stimulant medications in cocaine dependence, and the amphetamine replacement strategy for amphetamine dependence; (4) application of agonist-like/replacement strategies, including clinical requirements and risks; and (5) directions for research.
由于法律和社会问题与兴奋剂滥用和依赖所具有的严重行为及生物学特征交织在一起,兴奋剂滥用和依赖所引发的问题极为严重。这些问题因对家庭和社会造成的不良后果而愈发复杂。非法性和污名化加剧了使用兴奋剂的后果以及治疗过程中的困难。特定行为干预措施已被证明对治疗物质使用障碍(SUDs)有效。药物治疗在治疗中也发挥着重要作用。针对阿片类药物和尼古丁依赖,有效的激动剂和拮抗剂药物疗法以及对症治疗方法均已存在。然而,无论是激动剂还是拮抗剂,均未被批准为治疗兴奋剂滥用或依赖的唯一有效药物。尽管如此,一种类似于激动剂或“替代”策略,类似于针对尼古丁和阿片类药物依赖的策略,正取得令人鼓舞的成果。临床前和临床研究环境均已产生了支持数据。将类似激动剂的方法应用于兴奋剂滥用和依赖存在科学、临床、社会及法律障碍。其中一些障碍类似于过去和当前对阿片类药物替代疗法的担忧。其他则是兴奋剂药物、效应和临床特征所特有的。在此,作者们探讨了以下内容:(1)激动剂和拮抗剂药物治疗策略;(2)临床前研究,包括方法学途径、阿片类药物和尼古丁替代疗法以及用于兴奋剂依赖的激动剂;(3)可卡因依赖中使用兴奋剂药物的临床报告以及苯丙胺依赖的苯丙胺替代策略;(4)类似激动剂/替代策略的应用,包括临床要求和风险;以及(5)研究方向。