• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

致癌物鉴定与评估的科学与实践。

The science and practice of carcinogen identification and evaluation.

作者信息

Cogliano Vincent James, Baan Robert A, Straif Kurt, Grosse Yann, Secretan Marie Béatrice, El Ghissassi Fatiha, Kleihues Paul

机构信息

International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Sep;112(13):1269-74. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6950.

DOI:10.1289/ehp.6950
PMID:15345338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1247515/
Abstract

Several national and international health agencies have established programs with the aim of identifying agents and exposures that cause cancer in humans. Carcinogen identification is an activity grounded in the scientific evaluation of the results of human epidemiologic studies, long-term bioassays in experimental animals, and other data relevant to an evaluation of carcinogenicity and its mechanisms. In this commentary, after a brief discussion of the science basis common to the evaluation of carcinogens across different programs, we discuss in more detail the principles and procedures currently used by the IARC Monographs program.

摘要

几个国家和国际卫生机构已制定了相关计划,旨在识别导致人类患癌的因素和暴露源。致癌物鉴定是一项基于对人类流行病学研究结果、实验动物长期生物测定以及其他与致癌性及其机制评估相关数据进行科学评估的活动。在本评论中,在简要讨论不同计划中致癌物评估共有的科学基础之后,我们将更详细地讨论国际癌症研究机构(IARC)专论计划目前使用的原则和程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c911/1247515/0aa42c12b018/ehp0112-001269f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c911/1247515/0bc9cd5be486/ehp0112-001269f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c911/1247515/bc5b5255e47a/ehp0112-001269f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c911/1247515/0aa42c12b018/ehp0112-001269f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c911/1247515/0bc9cd5be486/ehp0112-001269f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c911/1247515/bc5b5255e47a/ehp0112-001269f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c911/1247515/0aa42c12b018/ehp0112-001269f3.jpg

相似文献

1
The science and practice of carcinogen identification and evaluation.致癌物鉴定与评估的科学与实践。
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Sep;112(13):1269-74. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6950.
2
[Criteria, rules and procedures adopted by IARC in evaluating risks from different carcinogenic agents for humans].[国际癌症研究机构在评估不同致癌物质对人类的风险时采用的标准、规则和程序]
Vopr Onkol. 2007;53(6):621-41.
3
IARC monographs, industry influence, and upgrading, downgrading, and under-grading chemicals: a personal point of view. International Agency for Research on Cancer.国际癌症研究机构专论、行业影响以及化学物质的升级、降级和评级不足:个人观点。国际癌症研究机构
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002 Jul-Sep;8(3):249-70. doi: 10.1179/107735202800338795.
4
Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides.使用化学信息学对化学品进行风险评估的优先级排序:来自国际癌症研究机构农药专论的实例
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Dec;124(12):1823-1829. doi: 10.1289/EHP186. Epub 2016 May 10.
5
Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.评价终生动物致癌试验在鉴定人类癌症危险度中的效用。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Oct;60:550-62. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
6
Current criteria to establish human carcinogens.确立人类致癌物的现行标准。
Semin Cancer Biol. 2004 Dec;14(6):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2004.06.003.
7
Appropriate models and an understanding of carcinogenic mechanisms--requirements for hazard risk assessment.合适的模型及对致癌机制的理解——危害风险评估的要求
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2003 Jan-Mar;4(1):75-8.
8
Alleged misconceptions' distort perceptions of environmental cancer risks.所谓的误解扭曲了对环境致癌风险的认知。
FASEB J. 2001 Jan;15(1):195-203. doi: 10.1096/fj.99-1056com.
9
[Identification of human carcinogenic risks in IARC monographs].[国际癌症研究机构专论中人类致癌风险的识别]
Bull Cancer. 1995;82(5):339-48.
10
Use of carcinogenicity bioassays in the IARC monographs.国际癌症研究机构专论中致癌性生物测定的应用。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Sep;1076:592-600. doi: 10.1196/annals.1371.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Update on Occupational Cancer for Better Cancer Prevention and Control.职业性癌症最新进展:助力更好的癌症预防与控制
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Dec 1;25(12):4465-4476. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.12.4465.
2
An Approach to Assessing the Influence of Environmental and Occupational Cancer Hazard Identification on Policy Decision-Making.评估环境和职业性致癌危害识别对政策决策影响的方法。
Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Dec;131(12):125001. doi: 10.1289/EHP12681. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Prioritizing cancer hazard assessments for IARC Monographs using an integrated approach of database fusion and text mining.

本文引用的文献

1
THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?环境与疾病:关联还是因果关系?
Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58(5):295-300. doi: 10.1177/003591576505800503.
2
Epidemiological and mechanistic data suggest that 1,3-butadiene will not be carcinogenic to humans at exposures likely to be encountered in the environment or workplace.流行病学和机理数据表明,在环境或工作场所可能遇到的暴露水平下,1,3 - 丁二烯不会对人类致癌。
Carcinogenesis. 1995 Feb;16(2):165-71. doi: 10.1093/carcin/16.2.165.
3
Mechanistic data indicate that 1,3-butadiene is a human carcinogen.
利用数据库融合和文本挖掘的综合方法优先进行 IARC 专著的癌症危害评估。
Environ Int. 2021 Nov;156:106624. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106624. Epub 2021 May 10.
4
Concordance between sites of tumor development in humans and in experimental animals for 111 agents that are carcinogenic to humans.人类肿瘤发生部位与 111 种人类致癌剂在实验动物中的肿瘤发生部位的一致性。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2019;22(7-8):203-236. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2019.1642586.
5
The IARC Monographs: Updated Procedures for Modern and Transparent Evidence Synthesis in Cancer Hazard Identification.IARC 专著:癌症危险识别中现代透明证据综合的更新程序。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Jan 1;112(1):30-37. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz169.
6
Epidemiological science and cancer control.流行病学与癌症防治
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Sep 21;73(suppl 1):e627s. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e627s.
7
Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews.人工甜味饮料对体重影响的综述中研究结果与偏倚风险、研究资助及作者经济利益冲突之间的关系:一项综述的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 8;11(9):e0162198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162198. eCollection 2016.
8
Low-dose radiation risk and individual variation in radiation sensitivity in Fukushima.福岛低剂量辐射风险与辐射敏感性的个体差异
J Radiat Res. 2016 Jan;57(1):98-100. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrv053. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
9
Use of mechanistic data in the IARC evaluations of the carcinogenicity of polychlorinated biphenyls and related compounds.多氯联苯及相关化合物致癌性的国际癌症研究机构评估中机制数据的使用
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Feb;23(3):2220-9. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4829-4. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
10
Comparative pathobiology of environmentally induced lung cancers in humans and rodents.人类和啮齿动物环境诱导肺癌的比较病理生物学
Toxicol Pathol. 2015 Jan;43(1):107-14. doi: 10.1177/0192623314556516. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
机理数据表明1,3 - 丁二烯是一种人类致癌物。
Carcinogenesis. 1995 Feb;16(2):157-63. doi: 10.1093/carcin/16.2.157.