Montalto Norman J, Ferry Linda H, Stanhiser Tiffany
Western Virginia University, USA.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004 Aug;104(8):317-23.
Tobacco use has been identified as the primary preventable cause of premature deaths and disability, yet results of a previous survey show that undergraduate allopathic medical schools do not adequately address this topic.
To assess the content and extent of tobacco education and intervention skills in osteopathic medical schools' curricula.
A mailed survey with 19 questions similar to one used for allopathic medical schools.
Nineteen osteopathic medical schools.
Responses were obtained from each associate dean for medical education or representative.
Curriculum in seven basic science and six clinical science content areas (elective or required), hours of tobacco use intervention education, and resource materials used to design curricula.
Average number of total content areas covered was 10.2 (6 +/- 1.6 basic science areas, 4.17 +/- 1.54 clinical areas) with a range of 2 to 13. Nine (47%) schools reported covering all seven basic science areas, and one school reported covering none. Eleven (64.7%) of seventeen schools reported less than 3 hours of training in tobacco dependence treatment techniques during all 4 years. Sixty percent of schools do not require clinical training in smoking cessation techniques. Thirty-six percent require clinical training in an artificial setting without patients. None of the schools require clinical training with live patients. The schools founded after 1920 covered an average of almost twice as many content areas as those founded before 1920 (11.1 vs 6.6; P = .018).
Most US osteopathic medical school graduates are not being adequately educated to treat nicotine dependence as recommended by the National Cancer Institute expert panel and the Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline. Specifically, osteopathic medical education is deficient in clinical nicotine dependence treatment during the third and fourth years.
烟草使用已被确认为过早死亡和残疾的主要可预防原因,但此前一项调查结果显示,本科西医医学院校并未充分涉及这一主题。
评估整骨医学院校课程中烟草教育的内容和范围以及干预技能。
一项邮寄调查问卷,包含19个问题,与用于西医医学院校的问卷类似。
19所整骨医学院校。
从各医学院的医学教育副院长或代表处获得回复。
七个基础科学和六个临床科学内容领域(选修或必修)的课程、烟草使用干预教育的时长以及用于设计课程的参考资料。
涵盖的内容领域总数平均为10.2个(基础科学领域6±1.6个,临床领域4.17±1.54个),范围为2至13个。9所(47%)学校报告涵盖了所有七个基础科学领域,1所学校报告未涵盖任何基础科学领域。17所学校中有11所(64.7%)报告在四年期间烟草依赖治疗技术的培训时长不足3小时。60%的学校不要求进行戒烟技术的临床培训。36%的学校要求在无患者的模拟环境中进行临床培训。没有学校要求在真实患者身上进行临床培训。1920年后成立的学校涵盖的内容领域平均几乎是1920年前成立学校的两倍(11.1对6.6;P = 0.018)。
大多数美国整骨医学院校的毕业生未按照美国国立癌症研究所专家小组和公共卫生服务临床实践指南的建议接受充分的尼古丁依赖治疗教育。具体而言,整骨医学教育在三、四年级的临床尼古丁依赖治疗方面存在不足。