Saxon Dale W, Tunnicliff Godfrey, Brokaw James J, Raess Beat U
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Evansville, USA.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004 Mar;104(3):121-6.
Reflecting society's interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), most allopathic medical schools in the United States offer instruction in CAM. Pertinent information about the teaching of CAM at osteopathic medical schools is lacking. The authors therefore sought to document the form and content of CAM instruction at osteopathic medical schools and compare their findings with those reported for allopathic medical schools in a recently published survey. Phone conversations with academic officials at each of the 19 colleges of osteopathic medicine revealed that only one school did not teach CAM. With the help of these officials, the authors identified 25 CAM instructors at 18 osteopathic medical schools and sent them questionnaires. All returned a completed form with details about CAM instruction at their schools. The authors found that CAM material was usually presented in required courses sponsored by clinical departments, was most likely taught in the first 2 years of medical school, and involved fewer than 20 contact hours of instruction. The topics most often taught were acupuncture (68%), herbs and botanicals (68%), spirituality (56%), dietary therapy (52%), and homeopathy (48%). Most (72%) CAM instructors were also practitioners of CAM modes of therapy. Few (12%) of the instructors taught CAM from an evidence-based perspective. The authors conclude that the form and content of CAM instruction at osteopathic medical schools is similar to that offered at allopathic medical schools and that both osteopathic and allopathic medical schools should strive to teach CAM with less advocacy and more reliance on evidence-based medicine.
反映出社会对补充和替代医学(CAM)的兴趣,美国大多数对抗疗法医学院校都提供补充和替代医学方面的教学。目前尚缺乏有关整骨医学院校补充和替代医学教学的相关信息。因此,作者试图记录整骨医学院校补充和替代医学教学的形式和内容,并将他们的研究结果与最近发表的一项针对对抗疗法医学院校的调查结果进行比较。通过与19所整骨医学院校的学术官员进行电话沟通发现,只有一所学校不教授补充和替代医学。在这些官员的帮助下,作者在18所整骨医学院校中确定了25名补充和替代医学教师,并向他们发送了调查问卷。所有人都返回了一份填写完整的表格,其中包含他们所在学校补充和替代医学教学的详细信息。作者发现,补充和替代医学的教学内容通常在临床科室开设的必修课中呈现,最有可能在医学院的前两年进行教学,且教学时长少于20个学时。最常讲授的主题包括针灸(68%)、草药和植物药(68%)、灵性(56%)、饮食疗法(52%)和顺势疗法(48%)。大多数(72%)补充和替代医学教师也是补充和替代医学疗法的从业者。很少有教师(12%)从循证医学的角度教授补充和替代医学。作者得出结论,整骨医学院校补充和替代医学教学的形式和内容与对抗疗法医学院校相似,整骨医学院校和对抗疗法医学院校都应努力减少宣传色彩,更多地依靠循证医学来教授补充和替代医学。