Velvart P, Ebner-Zimmermann U, Ebner J P
Int Endod J. 2004 Oct;37(10):687-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00852.x.
To compare long-term loss of papilla height when using either the papilla base incision (PBI) or the standard papilla mobilization incision in marginal full thickness flap procedures in cases with no evidence of marginal periodontitis.
Twelve healthy patients, free of periodontal disease, who had intact interdental papillae were referred for surgical treatment of persisting apical periodontitis and included in the study. The flap design consisted of two releasing incisions connected by a horizontal incision. The marginal incision involved the complete mobilization of the entire papilla in one interproximal space but in the other interproximal space the PBI was performed. Further apically a full thickness flap was raised. Following flap retraction, standard apical root-end resection and root-end filling was performed. Flap closure was achieved with microsurgical sutures. The PBI was sutured with two to three interrupted sutures (size 7/0), the elevated papilla was reapproximated with vertical mattress sutures (size 7/0), which were removed 3-5 days after the surgery. The height of the interdental papilla was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively after 1-, 3- and 12-month recall using plaster replicas. The loss of papilla height was measured using a laser scanner. Papilla paired sites were evaluated and statistically analysed.
Most papilla recession took place within the first month after the surgery in the complete elevation of the papilla. Further small increase in loss of papilla height resulted at 3 months. After 1 year the loss of height diminished to 0.98 +/- 0.75 mm, but there was no statistical difference between the various recall intervals. In contrast, after PBI only minor changes could be detected at all times. There was a highly significant difference between the two incision techniques for all recall appointments (P < 0.001).
In the short as well as long-term the PBI allows predictable recession-free healing of the interdental papilla. In contrast, complete mobilization of the papilla displayed a marked loss of the papilla height in the initial healing phase although this was less evident 1 year postoperatively. In aesthetically relevant areas the use of the PBI is recommended, to avoid opening of the interproximal space, when periradicular surgical treatment is necessary.
比较在无边缘性牙周炎证据的病例中,在边缘全厚瓣手术中使用乳头基部切口(PBI)或标准乳头松动切口时乳头高度的长期丧失情况。
12名无牙周疾病且牙间乳头完整的健康患者因持续性根尖周炎接受手术治疗并纳入研究。瓣的设计包括两个由水平切口连接的松弛切口。边缘切口在一个邻间隙中涉及整个乳头的完全松动,但在另一个邻间隙中进行PBI。再向根尖方向掀起全厚瓣。瓣复位后,进行标准的根尖根端切除术和根端充填。用显微外科缝线关闭瓣。PBI用两到三针间断缝线(7/0号)缝合,抬高的乳头用垂直褥式缝线(7/0号)重新对合,术后3至5天拆除。术前以及术后1个月、3个月和12个月复诊时,使用石膏模型评估牙间乳头的高度。使用激光扫描仪测量乳头高度的丧失。对乳头配对部位进行评估并进行统计学分析。
在乳头完全掀起后的手术后第一个月内,大多数乳头退缩发生。在3个月时,乳头高度丧失进一步小幅增加。1年后,高度丧失减少至0.98±0.75毫米,但在不同的复诊间隔之间没有统计学差异。相比之下,在PBI后,在所有时间仅能检测到微小变化。在所有复诊时,两种切口技术之间存在高度显著差异(P<0.001)。
短期和长期来看,PBI均可使牙间乳头实现可预测的无退缩愈合。相比之下,乳头的完全松动在初始愈合阶段显示出乳头高度的明显丧失,尽管在术后1年不太明显。在美学相关区域,当需要进行根尖周手术治疗时,建议使用PBI以避免邻间隙开放。