Szekely Miklos, Petervari Erika, Szelenyi Zoltan
Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pécs, Hungary.
Front Biosci. 2004 Sep 1;9:2746-63. doi: 10.2741/1433.
Prevailing changes in the feeding status or the nutritional status, in general, can modify the expression of many orexigenic and anorexigenic peptides, which influence hypothalamic functions. These peptides usually adjust body temperature according to anabolic (increased appetite with suppressed metabolic rate and body temperature) or catabolic (anorexia with enhanced metabolism and temperature) patterns. It was plausible to presume that such peptides contribute to regulated changes of body temperature (either fever or hypothermia) in systemic inflammation, particularly since anorexia is a common feature in inflammatory processes. No consistent, common, or uniform way of action was, however, demonstrated, which could have described the effects of various peptides. With the exception of cholecystokinin (CCK), all investigated peptides were devoid of real thermoregulatory actions: they influenced the metabolic rate (and consequently body temperature), but not the mechanisms of heat loss. Central CCK is indeed catabolic and may participate in febrigenesis. Leptin may activate various cytokines, catabolic peptides and may inhibit anabolic peptides, but it probably has no direct febrigenic effect and it is not indispensable in fever. Melanocortins and corticotropin-releasing factor provide catabolic adaptive mechanisms to food intake (diet induced thermogenesis) and environmental stress, respectively, but they act rather as endogenous antipyretic substances during systemic inflammation, possibly contributing to the mechanisms of limitation of fever. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides enhance the expression of most of these catabolic peptides. In contrast, neuropeptide Y (NPY) expression may not be changed, only its release is decreased at specific nuclei, a defective NPY effect may also contribute to the febrile rise in body temperature. The data provide no clear-cut explanation for the mechanism of hypothermia seen in systemic inflammation. According to speculations, a presumed, overflow,-type release of NPY from the hypothalamic nuclei, as well as a suppression of the activity of catabolic peptides, could possibly cause hypothermia. There are no cues, however, referring to the identity of factors that could trigger such changes during systemic inflammation in order to induce hypothermia.
一般来说,喂养状态或营养状态的普遍变化会改变许多促食欲肽和抑食欲肽的表达,进而影响下丘脑功能。这些肽通常根据合成代谢(食欲增加,代谢率和体温降低)或分解代谢(厌食,代谢和体温升高)模式来调节体温。可以推测,此类肽有助于系统性炎症中体温的调节性变化(发热或体温过低),尤其是因为厌食是炎症过程中的常见特征。然而,并未证明存在一致、通用或统一的作用方式来描述各种肽的作用。除胆囊收缩素(CCK)外,所有研究的肽都没有真正的体温调节作用:它们影响代谢率(进而影响体温),但不影响散热机制。中枢CCK确实具有分解代谢作用,可能参与发热过程。瘦素可能激活各种细胞因子、分解代谢肽,并可能抑制合成代谢肽,但它可能没有直接的致热作用,在发热过程中也不是必不可少的。黑皮质素和促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子分别为食物摄入(饮食诱导产热)和环境应激提供分解代谢适应性机制,但在系统性炎症期间,它们更像是内源性解热物质,可能有助于限制发热的机制。细菌脂多糖会增强大多数这些分解代谢肽的表达。相比之下,神经肽Y(NPY)的表达可能不变,只是在特定核团处其释放减少,NPY效应缺陷也可能导致体温发热性升高。这些数据并未对系统性炎症中出现的体温过低机制给出明确解释。据推测,下丘脑核团中NPY可能存在一种假定的、溢出型释放,以及分解代谢肽活性的抑制,可能会导致体温过低。然而,没有线索表明在系统性炎症期间能够触发此类变化以诱导体温过低的因素的身份。