Romanovsky Andrej A, Almeida Maria C, Aronoff David M, Ivanov Andrei I, Konsman Jan P, Steiner Alexandre A, Turek Victoria F
Systemic Inflammation Laboratory, Trauma Research, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 West Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA.
Front Biosci. 2005 Sep 1;10:2193-216. doi: 10.2741/1690.
Systemic inflammation is accompanied by changes in body temperature, either fever or hypothermia. Over the past decade, the rat and mouse have become the predominant animal models, and new species-specific tools (recombinant antibodies and other proteins) and genetic manipulations have been applied to study fever and hypothermia. Remarkable progress has been achieved. It has been established that the same inflammatory agent can induce either fever or hypothermia, depending on several factors. It has also been established that experimental fevers are generally polyphasic, and that different mechanisms underlie different febrile phases. Signaling mechanisms of the most common pyrogen used, bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), have been found to involve the Toll-like receptor 4. The roles of cytokines (such as interleukins-1beta and 6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) have been further detailed, and new early mediators (e.g., complement factor 5a and platelet-activating factor) have been proposed. Our understanding of how peripheral inflammatory messengers cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has changed. The view that the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis is the major port of entry for pyrogenic cytokines has lost its dominant position. The vagal theory has emerged and then fallen. Consensus has been reached that the BBB is not a divider preventing signal transduction, but rather the transducer itself. In the endothelial and perivascular cells of the BBB, upstream signaling molecules (e.g., pro-inflammatory cytokines) are switched to a downstream mediator, prostaglandin (PG) E2. An indispensable role of PGE2 in the febrile response to LPS has been demonstrated in studies with targeted disruption of genes encoding either PGE2-synthesizing enzymes or PGE2 receptors. The PGE2-synthesizing enzymes include numerous phospholipases (PL) A2, cyclooxygenases (COX)-1 and 2, and several newly discovered terminal PGE synthases (PGES). It has been realized that the "physiological," low-scale production of PGE2 and the accelerated synthesis of PGE2 in inflammation are catalyzed by different sets of these enzymes. The "inflammatory" set includes several isoforms of PLA2 and inducible isoforms of COX (COX-2) and microsomal (m) PGES (mPGES-1). The PGE2 receptors are multiple; one of them, EP3 is likely to be a primary "fever receptor." The effector pathways of fever start from EP3-bearing preoptic neurons. These neurons have been found to project to the raphe pallidus, where premotor sympathetic neurons driving thermogenesis in the brown fat and skin vaso-constriction are located. The rapid progress in our understanding of how thermoeffectors are controlled has revealed the inadequacy of set point-based definitions of thermoregulatory responses. New definitions (offered in this review) are based on the idea of balance of active and passive processes and use the term balance point. Inflammatory signaling and thermoeffector pathways involved in fever and hypothermia are modulated by neuropeptides and peptide hormones. Roles for several "new" peptides (e.g., leptin and orexins) have been proposed. Roles for several "old" peptides (e.g., arginine vasopressin, angiotensin II, and cholecystokinin) have been detailed or revised. New pharmacological tools to treat fevers (i.e., selective inhibitors of COX-2) have been rapidly introduced into clinical practice, but have not become magic bullets and appeared to have severe side effects. Several new targets for antipyretic therapy, including mPGES-1, have been identified.
全身炎症伴随着体温变化,即发热或体温过低。在过去十年中,大鼠和小鼠已成为主要的动物模型,并且新的物种特异性工具(重组抗体和其他蛋白质)以及基因操作已被应用于研究发热和体温过低。已经取得了显著进展。已经确定,相同的炎症介质可根据多种因素诱导发热或体温过低。还已确定实验性发热通常是多相的,并且不同的发热阶段有不同的机制。已发现最常用的热原细菌脂多糖(LPS)的信号传导机制涉及Toll样受体4。细胞因子(如白细胞介素-1β、6和肿瘤坏死因子-α)的作用已得到进一步详细阐述,并且提出了新的早期介质(如补体因子5a和血小板活化因子)。我们对周围炎症信使如何穿过血脑屏障(BBB)的理解已经改变。终板血管器是热原性细胞因子主要进入端口的观点已不再占据主导地位。迷走神经理论出现后又衰落了。已达成共识,血脑屏障不是阻止信号转导的分隔物,而是信号转导器本身。在血脑屏障的内皮细胞和血管周围细胞中,上游信号分子(如促炎细胞因子)转变为下游介质前列腺素(PG)E2。在对编码PGE2合成酶或PGE2受体的基因进行靶向破坏的研究中,已证明PGE2在对LPS的发热反应中起不可或缺的作用。PGE2合成酶包括多种磷脂酶(PL)A2、环氧化酶(COX)-1和2,以及几种新发现的末端PGE合成酶(PGES)。已经认识到,炎症中PGE2的“生理性”低水平产生和加速合成是由这些酶的不同组催化的。“炎症性”组包括几种PLA2同工型以及COX(COX-2)和微粒体(m)PGES(mPGES-1)的诱导型同工型。PGE2受体有多种;其中之一,EP3可能是主要的“发热受体”。发热的效应器途径从含有EP3的视前神经元开始。已发现这些神经元投射到中缝苍白核,驱动棕色脂肪产热和皮肤血管收缩的运动前交感神经元位于此处。我们对热效应器如何被控制的理解的快速进展揭示了基于调定点的体温调节反应定义的不足之处。新的定义(在本综述中提出)基于主动和被动过程平衡的概念,并使用平衡点一词。参与发热和体温过低的炎症信号传导和热效应器途径受到神经肽和肽类激素的调节。已提出几种“新”肽(如瘦素和食欲素)的作用。几种“旧”肽(如精氨酸加压素、血管紧张素II和胆囊收缩素)的作用已得到详细阐述或修订。治疗发热的新药理学工具(即COX-2选择性抑制剂)已迅速引入临床实践,但尚未成为万灵药,并且似乎有严重的副作用。已确定包括mPGES-1在内的几种新的解热治疗靶点。