Suppr超能文献

门球时间的关键是什么时候?来自 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死中再灌注与支架治疗的协调结果)和 CADILLAC(依替巴肽与器械降低晚期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发症的控制研究)试验的分析。

When is door-to-balloon time critical? Analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and CADILLAC (Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications) trials.

机构信息

LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Greensboro, North Carolina,

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 27;56(5):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to evaluate the impact of door-to-balloon time (DBT) on mortality depending on clinical risk and time to presentation.

BACKGROUND

DBT affects the mortality rate in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, but the impact may vary across subgroups.

METHODS

The CADILLAC (Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications) and HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trials evaluated stent and antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We studied the impact of DBT on mortality in 4,548 patients based on time to presentation and clinical risk.

RESULTS

The 1-year mortality rate was lower in patients with short versus long DBT (< or = 90 min vs. >90 min, 3.1% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.045). Short DBTs were associated with a lower mortality rate in patients with early presentation (< or = 90 min: 1.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.029) but not those with later presentation (>90 min: 4.0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.47). Short DBTs showed similar trends for a lower mortality rate in high-risk (5.7% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.12) and low-risk (1.1% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.25) patients. Short DBTs had similar relative risk reductions in patients with early presentation in high-risk (3.7% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.08) and low-risk (0.8% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.32) patients, although the absolute benefit was greatest in high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Short DBTs (< or = 90 min) are associated with a lower mortality rate in patients with early presentation but have less impact on the mortality rate in patients presenting later. The absolute mortality rate reduction with short DBT is greatest in high-risk patients presenting early. These data may be helpful in designing triage strategies for reperfusion therapy in patients presenting to non-percutaneous coronary intervention hospitals.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估门球时间(DBT)对死亡率的影响,同时考虑临床风险和就诊时间。

背景

在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,DBT 会影响死亡率,但这种影响可能因亚组而异。

方法

CADILLAC(依替巴肽与药物涂层球囊降低晚期经皮冠状动脉介入并发症的控制研究)和 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与血管重建和支架术的结局优化研究)试验评估了接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中支架和抗血栓治疗的效果。我们根据就诊时间和临床风险,在 4548 例患者中研究了 DBT 对死亡率的影响。

结果

与长 DBT(>90 分钟)相比,短 DBT(≤90 分钟)患者的 1 年死亡率更低(3.1% vs. 4.3%,p=0.045)。在早期就诊患者中,短 DBT 与较低的死亡率相关(≤90 分钟:1.9% vs. 3.8%,p=0.029),但在晚期就诊患者中并非如此(>90 分钟:4.0% vs. 4.6%,p=0.47)。对于高危(5.7% vs. 7.4%,p=0.12)和低危(1.1% vs. 1.6%,p=0.25)患者,短 DBT 同样显示出降低死亡率的趋势。在早期就诊的高危(3.7% vs. 7.0%,p=0.08)和低危(0.8% vs. 1.5%,p=0.32)患者中,短 DBT 具有相似的相对风险降低,但高危患者的绝对获益最大。

结论

在早期就诊的患者中,短 DBT(≤90 分钟)与较低的死亡率相关,但对就诊较晚的患者的死亡率影响较小。在早期就诊的高危患者中,短 DBT 降低死亡率的幅度最大。这些数据可能有助于设计在不能进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的医院对再灌注治疗进行分诊的策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验