Townsend Richard D, Dunn William J
Royal Air Force Upwood, Ramsey, England.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Jul;135(7):895-901; quiz 1036, 1038. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0335.
The authors conducted a study to evaluate the effect of saliva contamination on enamel and dentin before or after application of a self-etching adhesive.
The authors divided 120 extracted molars into enamel and dentin groups of 60 specimens each, and then further divided each group into three groups of 20 specimens each. Resin-based composite cylinders were bonded to tooth specimens that were uncontaminated (control) or were contaminated with saliva either before or after application of the adhesive and then loaded to the failure point. The authors calculated the mean shear bond strength for each group and subjected data to a one-way analysis of variance, or ANOVA, to test for differences among groups.
Mean shear bond strength was 16.7 megapascals (+/- 3.0 standard deviation, or SD) for the dentin control group, 14.8 MPa (+/- 2.3 SD) for dentin contaminated with saliva before adhesive application, 15.9 MPa (+/- 3.8 SD) for dentin contaminated with saliva after adhesive application, 19.1 MPa (+/- 4.8 SD) for the enamel control group, 12.3 MPa (+/- 4.4 SD) for enamel contaminated with saliva before adhesive application, and 13.1 MPa (+/- 5.5 SD) for enamel contaminated with saliva after adhesive application. One-way ANOVA detected no difference in the dentin groups, but the authors found a significant difference among enamel groups. Uncontaminated enamel had higher bond strengths than either of the contaminated enamel groups.
Saliva contamination did not affect the dentin shear bond strength of the self-etching adhesive. Saliva did have a detrimental effect on enamel bond strength.
Newer generations of adhesives appear to be more tolerant of saliva contamination, but proper isolation still should be accomplished until further research proves otherwise.
作者开展了一项研究,以评估唾液污染对自酸蚀粘结剂应用前后牙釉质和牙本质的影响。
作者将120颗拔除的磨牙分为牙釉质组和牙本质组,每组60个样本,然后将每组再进一步分为三组,每组20个样本。将树脂基复合树脂圆柱体粘结到未受污染(对照)的牙齿样本上,或在粘结剂应用之前或之后被唾液污染的牙齿样本上,然后加载至破坏点。作者计算了每组的平均剪切粘结强度,并对数据进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA),以检验组间差异。
牙本质对照组的平均剪切粘结强度为16.7兆帕(±3.0标准差,SD),粘结剂应用前被唾液污染的牙本质为14.8兆帕(±2.3 SD),粘结剂应用后被唾液污染的牙本质为15.9兆帕(±3.8 SD),牙釉质对照组为19.1兆帕(±4.8 SD),粘结剂应用前被唾液污染的牙釉质为12.3兆帕(±4.4 SD),粘结剂应用后被唾液污染的牙釉质为13.1兆帕(±5.5 SD)。单因素方差分析未发现牙本质组间存在差异,但作者发现牙釉质组间存在显著差异。未受污染的牙釉质的粘结强度高于任何一组受污染的牙釉质。
唾液污染不影响自酸蚀粘结剂的牙本质剪切粘结强度。唾液确实对牙釉质粘结强度有不利影响。
新一代粘结剂似乎对唾液污染更具耐受性,但在进一步研究证明并非如此之前,仍应进行适当的隔离。