Kermanshah H, Ghabraei Sh, Bitaraf T
Assistant Professor, Dental Research Center and Operative department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Summer;7(3):132-8. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
This study evaluated the effect of saliva contamination during bonding procedures without removing saliva on shear dentin bond strength of three adhesive generations when rubber dam isolation is not feasible.
Flat superficial dentin surfaces of seventy-two extracted human molars were randomly divided into three groups (A: Scotch Bond MP Plus (SBMP), B: Single Bond (SB), C: Prompt L-Pop) according to the applied adhesives and twelve subgroups (n=6) according to the following saliva contamination applied in different bonding steps. The specimens were contaminated with saliva after etching (A1 and B1), after primer application (A2), after adhesive application before polymerization (A3, B2 and C1), and after adhesive polymerization (A4, B3 and C2). Three subgroups were not contaminated as controls (A5, B4 and C3). Resin composite was placed on dentin subsequently followed by thermocycling. Shear test was performed by Universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The collected data were statically analyzed using one and two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD.
In contrast to SBMP and SB, the mean shear bond strength of Promote L-Pop was not significantly different between contaminated and uncontaminated subgroups. Mean shear bond strengths of SBMP subgroups contaminated after adhesive polymerization or uncontaminated were significantly higher compared to the other two groups (p<0.05).
Unlike Promote L-Pop, saliva contamination could reduce shear bond strength of the total-etch adhesives. Furthermore, the step of bonding procedures and the type of adhesive seems to be effective on the bond strength of adhesive contaminated with saliva.
本研究评估了在无法使用橡皮障隔离的情况下,粘结过程中不清除唾液时,三代粘结剂对牙本质剪切粘结强度的影响。
将72颗拔除的人磨牙的平坦浅表牙本质表面根据所使用的粘结剂随机分为三组(A组:Scotch Bond MP Plus(SBMP),B组:Single Bond(SB),C组:Prompt L-Pop),并根据在不同粘结步骤中施加的以下唾液污染情况分为12个亚组(n = 6)。标本在酸蚀后(A1和B1)、涂底漆后(A2)、聚合前涂粘结剂后(A3、B2和C1)以及粘结剂聚合后(A4、B3和C2)被唾液污染。三个亚组作为对照未被污染(A5、B4和C3)。随后在牙本质上放置树脂复合材料,然后进行热循环。使用万能试验机以0.5 mm/min的十字头速度进行剪切试验。使用单因素和双因素方差分析以及Tukey HSD对收集的数据进行统计学分析。
与SBMP和SB相比,Prompt L-Pop在污染和未污染亚组之间的平均剪切粘结强度没有显著差异。与其他两组相比,粘结剂聚合后被污染或未被污染的SBMP亚组的平均剪切粘结强度显著更高(p<0.05)。
与Prompt L-Pop不同,唾液污染会降低全酸蚀粘结剂的剪切粘结强度。此外,粘结步骤和粘结剂类型似乎对被唾液污染的粘结剂的粘结强度有影响。