Lara-Castro Cristina, Garvey W Timothy
Department of Nutrition Sciences, Webb 232, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1675 University Boulevard, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-3360, USA.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Sep;89(9):4197-205. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0683.
Insulin resistance is a central pathogenic factor for the metabolic syndrome and is associated with both generalized obesity and the accumulation of fat in the omental and intramyocellular compartments. In the context of the current obesity epidemic, it is imperative to consider diets in terms of their ability to both promote weight loss and ameliorate insulin resistance. Weight loss under any dietary formulation depends on hypocaloric intake, and only moderate weight loss (5-10%) is sufficient to augment insulin sensitivity. However, increments in insulin sensitivity may be more directly related to loss of intramyocellular or omental fat rather than loss of total body weight per se. The widespread acceptance of popular low-carbohydrate high-fat diets (e.g. Atkins Diet, Zone Diet, South Beach diet) further underscores the need to evaluate dietary interventions regarding their safety and metabolic effects. These high-fat diets have been shown to be safe in the short term; however, their long-term safety has not been established. With respect to insulin sensitivity, diets enriched in saturated fats can induce insulin resistance, whereas fat substitution with monounsaturated fats can enhance insulin sensitivity. On the other hand, high-fiber, high-carbohydrate diets comprised of foods with low caloric density can similarly be used for effective weight reduction and to ameliorate insulin resistance. Although some data suggest that low-glycemic index diets are most advantageous in this regard, these effects may have more to do with increments in dietary fiber than differences in available carbohydrates. Popular low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets are being fervently embraced as an alternative to challenging modifications in lifestyle and intentional calorie reduction. Current data do not support such unbridled enthusiasm for these diets, particularly in relationship to high-fiber, high-carbohydrate diets emphasizing intake of fresh vegetables and fruits. Long-term studies to determine the efficacy and safety of both popular and experimental diets are warranted.
胰岛素抵抗是代谢综合征的核心致病因素,与全身性肥胖以及网膜和肌细胞内脂肪堆积均有关联。在当前肥胖流行的背景下,必须从促进体重减轻和改善胰岛素抵抗的能力方面来考虑饮食。任何饮食配方下的体重减轻都取决于低热量摄入,仅适度体重减轻(5-10%)就足以增强胰岛素敏感性。然而,胰岛素敏感性的提高可能更直接地与肌细胞内或网膜脂肪的减少有关,而非总体重本身的减轻。流行的低碳水化合物高脂肪饮食(如阿特金斯饮食法、区域饮食法、南滩饮食法)被广泛接受,这进一步凸显了评估饮食干预措施的安全性和代谢效应的必要性。这些高脂肪饮食已被证明在短期内是安全的;然而,其长期安全性尚未确定。就胰岛素敏感性而言,富含饱和脂肪的饮食可诱发胰岛素抵抗,而用单不饱和脂肪替代脂肪则可增强胰岛素敏感性。另一方面,由低热量密度食物组成的高纤维、高碳水化合物饮食同样可用于有效减轻体重和改善胰岛素抵抗。尽管一些数据表明低血糖指数饮食在这方面最为有利,但这些影响可能更多地与膳食纤维的增加有关,而非可利用碳水化合物的差异。流行的低碳水化合物、高脂肪饮食正被热烈追捧,作为对具有挑战性的生活方式改变和有意减少热量摄入的替代方案。目前的数据并不支持对这些饮食的这种过度热情,特别是与强调摄入新鲜蔬菜和水果的高纤维、高碳水化合物饮食相比。有必要进行长期研究以确定流行饮食和实验性饮食的疗效和安全性。