Aragon Alan A, Schoenfeld Brad J, Wildman Robert, Kleiner Susan, VanDusseldorp Trisha, Taylor Lem, Earnest Conrad P, Arciero Paul J, Wilborn Colin, Kalman Douglas S, Stout Jeffrey R, Willoughby Darryn S, Campbell Bill, Arent Shawn M, Bannock Laurent, Smith-Ryan Abbie E, Antonio Jose
Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, California State University, Northridge, CA USA.
Department of Health Sciences, Lehman College, Bronx, NY USA.
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017 Jun 14;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12970-017-0174-y. eCollection 2017.
Position Statement: The International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) bases the following position stand on a critical analysis of the literature regarding the effects of diet types (macronutrient composition; eating styles) and their influence on body composition. The ISSN has concluded the following. 1) There is a multitude of diet types and eating styles, whereby numerous subtypes fall under each major dietary archetype. 2) All body composition assessment methods have strengths and limitations. 3) Diets primarily focused on fat loss are driven by a sustained caloric deficit. The higher the baseline body fat level, the more aggressively the caloric deficit may be imposed. Slower rates of weight loss can better preserve lean mass (LM) in leaner subjects. 4) Diets focused primarily on accruing LM are driven by a sustained caloric surplus to facilitate anabolic processes and support increasing resistance-training demands. The composition and magnitude of the surplus, as well as training status of the subjects can influence the nature of the gains. 5) A wide range of dietary approaches (low-fat to low-carbohydrate/ketogenic, and all points between) can be similarly effective for improving body composition. 6) Increasing dietary protein to levels significantly beyond current recommendations for athletic populations may result in improved body composition. Higher protein intakes (2.3-3.1 g/kg FFM) may be required to maximize muscle retention in lean, resistance-trained subjects under hypocaloric conditions. Emerging research on very high protein intakes (>3 g/kg) has demonstrated that the known thermic, satiating, and LM-preserving effects of dietary protein might be amplified in resistance-training subjects. 7) The collective body of intermittent caloric restriction research demonstrates no significant advantage over daily caloric restriction for improving body composition. 8) The long-term success of a diet depends upon compliance and suppression or circumvention of mitigating factors such as adaptive thermogenesis. 9) There is a paucity of research on women and older populations, as well as a wide range of untapped permutations of feeding frequency and macronutrient distribution at various energetic balances combined with training. Behavioral and lifestyle modification strategies are still poorly researched areas of weight management.
国际运动营养学会(ISSN)基于对有关饮食类型(宏量营养素组成;饮食方式)及其对身体成分影响的文献的批判性分析,得出以下立场。ISSN得出以下结论:1)存在多种饮食类型和饮食方式,每种主要饮食模式下又有众多子类型。2)所有身体成分评估方法都有优点和局限性。3)主要关注减脂的饮食以持续的热量不足为驱动。基线体脂水平越高,热量不足的程度可能就越激进。体重减轻速度较慢能更好地保留较瘦受试者的瘦体重(LM)。4)主要关注增加LM的饮食以持续的热量过剩为驱动,以促进合成代谢过程并支持不断增加的抗阻训练需求。热量过剩的组成和幅度以及受试者的训练状态会影响增肌的性质。5)广泛的饮食方法(从低脂到低碳水化合物/生酮,以及两者之间的所有情况)在改善身体成分方面可能同样有效。6)将膳食蛋白质摄入量增加到显著超过目前针对运动员群体的建议水平,可能会改善身体成分。在低热量条件下,较瘦的、进行抗阻训练的受试者可能需要更高的蛋白质摄入量(2.3 - 3.1克/千克去脂体重)来最大程度地保留肌肉。关于极高蛋白质摄入量(>3克/千克)的新研究表明,膳食蛋白质已知的产热、饱腹感和保留LM的作用在抗阻训练受试者中可能会增强。7)间歇性热量限制研究的总体结果表明,在改善身体成分方面,它相对于每日热量限制没有显著优势。8)一种饮食的长期成功取决于依从性以及对诸如适应性产热等缓解因素的抑制或规避。9)针对女性和老年人群的研究较少,而且在各种能量平衡状态下,结合训练的进食频率和宏量营养素分布还有大量未开发的组合方式。行为和生活方式改变策略在体重管理方面仍是研究较少的领域。