Koos Tibor, Tepper James M, Wilson Charles J
Section of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA.
J Neurosci. 2004 Sep 8;24(36):7916-22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2163-04.2004.
Most neurons in the neostriatum are GABAergic spiny projection neurons with extensive local axon collaterals innervating principally other spiny projection neurons. The other source of GABAergic inputs to spiny neurons derives from a small number of interneurons, of which the best characterized are the parvalbumin-containing, fast-spiking interneurons. Spiny neuron collateral inhibition was not demonstrated until recently, because the IPSPs recorded at the soma are surprisingly small. In contrast, interneuronal inhibition was readily detected, comprising much larger IPSPs. Here, we report the application of quantal analysis and compartmental modeling to compare and contrast IPSCs in spiny neurons originating from axon collaterals and interneurons. The results indicate that individual release sites at spiny and interneuron synapses have similar quantal sizes and baseline release probabilities. Interneuronal unitary IPSCs are several times larger because of their proximal location on the neuron and because they have a larger number of transmitter release sites. Despite the small amount of current they can deliver to the soma, spiny cell collateral synapses had moderately high baseline release probabilities (0.5-0.9), suggesting that they are not weak because of some form of depression or modulation. The size of unitary collateral synaptic currents increased monotonically during development. These results argue against models of competitive inhibition in neostriatum, including those in which competitive inhibition is transiently effective during development and learning, and suggest a different role for the spiny cell axon collaterals.
新纹状体中的大多数神经元是γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)能棘状投射神经元,其广泛的局部轴突侧支主要支配其他棘状投射神经元。GABA能输入到棘状神经元的另一个来源是少数中间神经元,其中特征最明显的是含小白蛋白的快速发放中间神经元。直到最近才证实棘状神经元侧支抑制,因为在胞体记录到的抑制性突触后电位(IPSPs)出奇地小。相比之下,中间神经元抑制很容易检测到,其IPSPs要大得多。在这里,我们报告了应用量子分析和房室模型来比较和对比源自轴突侧支和中间神经元的棘状神经元中的抑制性突触后电流(IPSCs)。结果表明,棘状神经元和中间神经元突触处的单个释放位点具有相似的量子大小和基线释放概率。中间神经元的单位IPSCs要大几倍,这是因为它们在神经元上的位置更靠近近端,并且它们有更多的递质释放位点。尽管它们能传递到胞体的电流量很小,但棘状细胞侧支突触具有中等较高的基线释放概率(0.5 - 0.9),这表明它们并非因某种形式的抑制或调制而微弱。单位侧支突触电流的大小在发育过程中单调增加。这些结果与新纹状体中的竞争性抑制模型相悖,包括那些认为竞争性抑制在发育和学习过程中短暂有效的模型,并提示棘状细胞轴突侧支具有不同的作用。