Marlinski Vladimir, Plotnik Meir, Goldberg Jay M
Department of Neurobiology, Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Jun;5(2):126-43. doi: 10.1007/s10162-003-4029-7.
Efferent fibers were electrically stimulated in the brain stem, while afferent activity was recorded from the superior vestibular nerve in barbiturate-anesthetized chinchillas. We concentrated on canal afferents, but otolith afferents were also studied. Among canal fibers, calyx afferents were recognized by their irregular discharge and low rotational gains. In separate experiments, stimulating electrodes were placed in the efferent cell groups ipsilateral or contralateral to the recording electrode or in the midline. While single shocks were ineffective, repetitive shock trains invariably led to increases in afferent discharge rate. Such excitatory responses consisted of fast and slow components. Fast components were large only at high shock frequencies (200-333/s), built up with exponential time constants <0.1 s, and showed response declines or adaptation during shock trains >1 s in duration. Slow responses were obtained even at shock rates of 50/s, built up and decayed with time constants of 15-30 s, and could show little adaptation. The more regular the discharge, the larger was the efferent response of an afferent fiber. Response magnitude was proportional to cvb, a normalized coefficient of interspike-interval variation (cv) raised to the power b = 0.7. The value of the exponent b did not depend on unit type (calyx vs. bouton plus dimorphic, canal vs. otolith) or on stimulation site (ipsilateral, contralateral, or midline). Responses were slightly smaller with contralateral or midline stimulation than with ipsilateral stimulation, and they were smaller for otolith, as compared to canal, fibers. An anatomical study had suggested that responses to contralateral afferent stimulation should be small or nonexistent in irregular canal fibers. The suggestion was not confirmed in this study. Contralateral responses, including the large responses typically seen in irregular fibers, were abolished by shallow midline incisions that should have severed crossing efferent axons.
在巴比妥麻醉的毛丝鼠中,对脑干中的传出纤维进行电刺激,同时记录前庭上神经的传入活动。我们主要关注半规管传入纤维,但也对耳石传入纤维进行了研究。在半规管纤维中,杯状传入纤维通过其不规则放电和低旋转增益得以识别。在单独的实验中,刺激电极置于与记录电极同侧或对侧的传出细胞群中,或置于中线处。单次电击无效,但重复电击序列总是会导致传入放电率增加。这种兴奋性反应由快速和慢速成分组成。快速成分仅在高电击频率(200 - 333/秒)时较大,以<0.1秒的指数时间常数形成,并在持续时间>1秒的电击序列中显示反应下降或适应。即使在50/秒的电击速率下也能获得慢速反应,以15 - 30秒的时间常数形成和衰减,且几乎没有适应现象。传入纤维的放电越规则,其传出反应就越大。反应幅度与cvb成正比,cvb是峰峰间期变异的归一化系数(cv*),其指数b = 0.7。指数b的值不取决于单位类型(杯状与终扣加双态、半规管与耳石)或刺激部位(同侧、对侧或中线)。与同侧刺激相比,对侧或中线刺激的反应略小,与半规管纤维相比,耳石纤维的反应更小。一项解剖学研究表明,不规则半规管纤维对侧传入刺激的反应应该很小或不存在。但本研究并未证实这一观点。对侧反应,包括不规则纤维中通常可见的大反应,被浅中线切口消除,该切口本应切断交叉的传出轴突。