Suppr超能文献

比较不同本体中对等概念之间的关联关系。

Comparing associative relationships among equivalent concepts across ontologies.

作者信息

Zhang Songmao, Bodenreider Olivier

机构信息

U.S. National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):459-66.

Abstract

Methods for comparing associative relationships across ontologies often rely solely on lexical similarity between the names of the relationships, which may lead to missed matches and inaccurate matches. In this paper, we propose a novel method based on the analysis of paths between equivalent concepts across ontologies. Patterns of relationships are identified for each associative relationship. The most frequent patterns indicate a correspondence between an associative relationship in one ontology and one relationship (or combination thereof) in the other. We applied this method to two ontologies of anatomy. Our method was able to identify the correspondence between relationships even in the absence of lexical similarity between relationship names. The various types of matches identified are discussed as well as the application of this method to detecting inconsistencies across the ontologies.

摘要

跨本体比较关联关系的方法通常仅依赖于关系名称之间的词汇相似性,这可能导致匹配遗漏和匹配不准确。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于分析跨本体等效概念之间路径的新方法。为每个关联关系识别关系模式。最常见的模式表明一个本体中的关联关系与另一个本体中的一个关系(或其组合)之间的对应关系。我们将此方法应用于两个解剖学本体。即使关系名称之间没有词汇相似性,我们的方法也能够识别关系之间的对应关系。讨论了所识别的各种匹配类型以及该方法在检测本体间不一致性方面的应用。

相似文献

4
Matching biomedical ontologies based on formal concept analysis.
J Biomed Semantics. 2018 Mar 19;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13326-018-0178-9.
6
Of mice and men: aligning mouse and human anatomies.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:61-5.
7
An analysis of FMA using structural self-bisimilarity.
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Jun;46(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
9
Comparing two approaches for aligning representations of anatomy.
Artif Intell Med. 2007 Mar;39(3):227-36. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Using semantic and structural properties of the Unified Medical Language System to discover potential terminological relationships.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):346-53. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2931. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
2
Experience in Aligning Anatomical Ontologies.
Int J Semant Web Inf Syst. 2007;3(2):1-26. doi: 10.4018/jswis.2007040101.
3
Comparing two approaches for aligning representations of anatomy.
Artif Intell Med. 2007 Mar;39(3):227-36. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
4
Mining cross-terminology links in the UMLS.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:624-8.
5
Integration of the Gene Ontology into an object-oriented architecture.
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 May 10;6:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-113.

本文引用的文献

1
A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy.
J Biomed Inform. 2003 Dec;36(6):478-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.007.
6
The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology.
Artif Intell Med. 1997 Feb;9(2):139-71. doi: 10.1016/s0933-3657(96)00369-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验