Hrysomallis C
Centre for Rehabilitation, Exercise and Sport Science, Victoria University, Victoria, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2004 Jun;7(2):156-64. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(04)80005-7.
There is no standard test to assess the ability of soft headgear to prevent the likelihood of head injuries in the Australian football codes. Therefore the impact energy attenuation of protective football headgear was assessed using a yielding artificial headform and impact surface to characterise the impact scenario. Seven soft football headgear of varying mass, materials and thickness were dropped from a height to generate impact energy of 56 J. The headgear were tested for a number of different impact locations. Accelerometers within the headform monitored the impact mechanics. A Head Injury Criterion (HIC) of 1000 was selected as the injury threshold. Reliability data, collected one week apart, revealed that the results were highly reproducible. Although several of the headgear generated HIC values about 1000 for the various impact locations, only one of the headgear, that with the greatest thickness (15 mm) generated a HIC score below 1000 for impacts to the side and front of the headgear. There was a significant correlation between headgear thickness and HIC scores. It was concluded that all but one of the commercially available soft football headgear tested provided inadequate impact energy attenuation due to the limited amount of padding. It is postulated that the padding material of the headgear would need to be at least 15 mm thick to offer adequate protection.
目前尚无标准测试来评估软式头盔在澳大利亚足球比赛规则中预防头部受伤可能性的能力。因此,使用可变形的人工头模和撞击表面来表征撞击场景,以评估防护性足球头盔的冲击能量衰减。将七个质量、材料和厚度各异的软式足球头盔从一定高度掉落,以产生56焦耳的冲击能量。对头盔的多个不同撞击位置进行了测试。头模内的加速度计监测撞击力学。选择1000的头部损伤标准(HIC)作为损伤阈值。相隔一周收集的可靠性数据显示,结果具有高度可重复性。尽管有几款头盔在不同撞击位置产生的HIC值约为1000,但只有一款头盔,即厚度最大(15毫米)的头盔,在头盔侧面和正面受到撞击时产生的HIC分数低于1000。头盔厚度与HIC分数之间存在显著相关性。得出的结论是,除一款头盔外,测试的所有市售软式足球头盔由于衬垫量有限,提供的冲击能量衰减不足。据推测,头盔的衬垫材料至少需要15毫米厚才能提供足够的保护。