Suppr超能文献

慢性下腰痛整脊治疗的剂量反应。

Dose-response for chiropractic care of chronic low back pain.

作者信息

Haas Mitchell, Groupp Elyse, Kraemer Dale F

机构信息

Center for Outcome Studies, Western States Chiropractic College, 2900 NE 132nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97230, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):574-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.02.008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There have been no trials of optimal chiropractic care in terms of number of office visits for spinal manipulation and other therapeutic modalities.

PURPOSE

To conduct a pilot study to make preliminary identification of the effects of number of chiropractic treatment visits for manipulation with and without physical modalities (PM) on chronic low back pain and disability.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Randomized controlled trial with a balanced 4x2 factorial design. Conducted in the faculty practice of a chiropractic college outpatient clinic.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Seventy-two patients with chronic, nonspecific low back pain of mechanical origin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Von Korff pain and disability (100-point) scales.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to visits (1, 2, 3 or 4 visits/week for 3 weeks) and to treatment regimen (spinal manipulation only or spinal manipulation with PM). All patients received high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation. Half received one or two of the following PM at each visit: soft tissue therapy, hot packs, electrotherapy or ultrasound.

RESULTS

Pain intensity: At 4 weeks, there was a substantial linear effect of visits favoring a larger number of visits: 5.7 points per 3 visits (SE=2.3, p=.014). There was no effect of treatment regimen. At 12 weeks, the data suggested the potential for a similar effect of visits on patients receiving both manipulation and PM. Functional disability: At 4 weeks, a visits effect was noted (p=.018); the slope for group means was approximately 5 points per 3 visits. There were no group differences at 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a positive, clinically important effect of the number of chiropractic treatments for chronic low back pain on pain intensity and disability at 4 weeks. Relief was substantial for patients receiving care 3 to 4 times per week for 3 weeks.

摘要

背景信息

就脊柱推拿及其他治疗方式的门诊就诊次数而言,尚未有关于最佳整脊治疗的试验。

目的

开展一项试点研究,初步确定接受或不接受物理治疗方式(PM)的整脊治疗就诊次数对慢性下腰痛和功能障碍的影响。

研究设计/地点:采用平衡4×2析因设计的随机对照试验。在一所整脊学院门诊诊所的教职员工诊所进行。

患者样本

72例机械性起源的慢性非特异性下腰痛患者。

主要观察指标

冯·科夫疼痛和功能障碍(100分)量表。

方法

患者被随机分配到就诊次数组(每周1、2、3或4次就诊,共3周)和治疗方案组(仅脊柱推拿或脊柱推拿加PM)。所有患者均接受高速低振幅脊柱推拿。一半患者每次就诊接受以下一种或两种PM:软组织治疗、热敷、电疗或超声。

结果

疼痛强度:在4周时,就诊次数有显著的线性效应,倾向于更多的就诊次数:每3次就诊疼痛减轻5.7分(标准误=2.3,p = 0.014)。治疗方案无影响。在12周时,数据表明就诊次数对接受推拿和PM的患者可能有类似影响。功能障碍:在4周时,观察到就诊次数的影响(p = 0.018);组均值斜率约为每3次就诊5分。在12周时无组间差异。

结论

整脊治疗次数对慢性下腰痛患者的疼痛强度和功能障碍在4周时有积极的、具有临床意义的影响。对于每周接受3至4次治疗,共3周的患者,疼痛缓解显著。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验