Suppr超能文献

物理治疗、整脊推拿以及提供教育手册治疗腰痛患者的比较。

A comparison of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, and provision of an educational booklet for the treatment of patients with low back pain.

作者信息

Cherkin D C, Deyo R A, Battié M, Street J, Barlow W

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle 98101, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 8;339(15):1021-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810083391502.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

There are few data on the relative effectiveness and costs of treatments for low back pain. We randomly assigned 321 adults with low back pain that persisted for seven days after a primary care visit to the McKenzie method of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, or a minimal intervention (provision of an educational booklet). Patients with sciatica were excluded. Physical therapy or chiropractic manipulation was provided for one month (the number of visits was determined by the practitioner but was limited to a maximum of nine); patients were followed for a total of two years. The bothersomeness of symptoms was measured on an 11-point scale, and the level of dysfunction was measured on the 24-point Roland Disability Scale.

RESULTS

After adjustment for base-line differences, the chiropractic group had less severe symptoms than the booklet group at four weeks (P=0.02), and there was a trend toward less severe symptoms in the physical therapy group (P=0.06). However, these differences were small and not significant after transformations of the data to adjust for their non-normal distribution. Differences in the extent of dysfunction among the groups were small and approached significance only at one year, with greater dysfunction in the booklet group than in the other two groups (P=0.05). For all outcomes, there were no significant differences between the physical-therapy and chiropractic groups and no significant differences among the groups in the numbers of days of reduced activity or missed work or in recurrences of back pain. About 75 percent of the subjects in the therapy groups rated their care as very good or excellent, as compared with about 30 percent of the subjects in the booklet group (P<0.001). Over a two-year period, the mean costs of care were $437 for the physical-therapy group, $429 for the chiropractic group, and $153 for the booklet group.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with low back pain, the McKenzie method of physical therapy and chiropractic manipulation had similar effects and costs, and patients receiving these treatments had only marginally better outcomes than those receiving the minimal intervention of an educational booklet. Whether the limited benefits of these treatments are worth the additional costs is open to question.

摘要

背景与方法

关于腰痛治疗的相对疗效和成本的数据较少。我们将321名在初级保健就诊后腰痛持续7天的成年人随机分配至麦肯齐物理治疗法、脊椎按摩疗法或最小干预组(提供一本教育手册)。坐骨神经痛患者被排除。物理治疗或脊椎按摩疗法为期1个月(就诊次数由从业者确定,但最多为9次);对患者进行了为期两年的随访。症状的困扰程度采用11分制进行测量,功能障碍水平采用24分的罗兰残疾量表进行测量。

结果

在对基线差异进行调整后,脊椎按摩疗法组在4周时的症状比手册组轻(P = 0.02),物理治疗组有症状较轻的趋势(P = 0.06)。然而,在对数据进行转换以调整其非正态分布后,这些差异很小且不显著。各组之间功能障碍程度的差异很小,仅在1年时接近显著水平,手册组的功能障碍比其他两组更严重(P = 0.05)。对于所有结局,物理治疗组和脊椎按摩疗法组之间没有显著差异,各组在活动减少天数、误工天数或腰痛复发次数方面也没有显著差异。治疗组中约75%的受试者将他们接受的治疗评为非常好或优秀,相比之下,手册组中约30%的受试者这样评价(P<0.001)。在两年期间,物理治疗组的平均护理成本为437美元,脊椎按摩疗法组为429美元,手册组为153美元。

结论

对于腰痛患者,麦肯齐物理治疗法和脊椎按摩疗法具有相似的效果和成本,接受这些治疗的患者仅比接受教育手册这种最小干预的患者略好。这些治疗的有限益处是否值得额外的成本尚值得怀疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验