Kerstein Joshua, Soodan Ajay, Qamar Mehdi, Majid Mazhar, Lichstein Edgar, Hollander Gerald, Shani Jacob
Maimonides Medical Center, 953 49th St, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA.
Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3):716-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3.716.
We studied the use of perioperative IV and oral administration of amiodarone for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
In the United States, > 500,000 patients undergo CABG each year. Numerous studies to date have suggested that postoperative atrial fibrillation occurs in 30 to 50% of patients, leading to significant morbidity, including hypotension, heart failure, thromboembolic complications, prolonged hospital stay, and increased hospital costs. The objective of this study was to assess the use of IV amiodarone in combination with oral amiodarone to reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.
From January 1999 to October 1999, 51 patients scheduled for CABG were randomly selected for participation in the amiodarone administration trial. IV amiodarone, 0.73 mg/min, was administered on call to the operating room for 48 h, followed by oral amiodarone, 400 mg q12h, for the next 3 days. The amiodarone group was case-control matched to the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in 92 patients undergoing CABG using conventional medical therapy during the same period. The primary end point of this study was the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs, compared to the control group undergoing CABG during the same time.
Atrial fibrillation occurred in 3 of 51 patients (5.88%) in the amiodarone group, compared to 24 of 92 patients (26.08%) in the control group. Length of hospital stay in the amiodarone group was less than in the control group (5.3 days vs 6.7 days), with a trend toward decrease in hospital costs.
The administration of IV amiodarone in conjunction with oral amiodarone for a total dose of 4,500 mg over 5 days appears to be a hemodynamically well-tolerated, safe, and effective treatment in decreasing the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, shortening length of stay, and a trend toward lowering hospital costs, even in patients with significantly reduced left ventricular function (< 30%). A large multicenter study using IV and oral amiodarone should be pursued prior to deciding whether its use should become standard therapy in all patients undergoing CABG in order to decrease the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.
我们研究了围手术期静脉注射和口服胺碘酮预防冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)患者术后房颤的效果。
在美国,每年有超过50万患者接受CABG手术。迄今为止的众多研究表明,30%至50%的患者会发生术后房颤,导致严重的并发症,包括低血压、心力衰竭、血栓栓塞并发症、住院时间延长和住院费用增加。本研究的目的是评估静脉注射胺碘酮联合口服胺碘酮以降低术后房颤的发生率。
从1999年1月至1999年10月,随机选择51例计划进行CABG的患者参与胺碘酮给药试验。在接到手术室通知后,静脉注射胺碘酮,速度为0.73mg/分钟,持续48小时,随后在接下来的3天内口服胺碘酮,400mg,每12小时一次。胺碘酮组与同期92例接受传统药物治疗的CABG患者术后房颤的发生率进行病例对照匹配。本研究的主要终点是术后房颤的发生率、住院时间和住院费用,并与同期接受CABG的对照组进行比较。
胺碘酮组51例患者中有3例(5.88%)发生房颤,而对照组92例患者中有24例(26.08%)发生房颤。胺碘酮组的住院时间短于对照组(5.3天对6.7天),住院费用有下降趋势。
静脉注射胺碘酮联合口服胺碘酮,5天内总剂量达4500mg,似乎是一种血流动力学耐受性良好、安全有效的治疗方法,可降低术后房颤的发生率,缩短住院时间,并有可能降低住院费用,即使是左心室功能显著降低(<30%)的患者。在决定胺碘酮是否应成为所有接受CABG患者的标准治疗方法以降低术后房颤发生率之前,应进行一项使用静脉注射和口服胺碘酮的大型多中心研究。