Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带重建翻修术:失败原因及临床结果

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: etiology of failures and clinical results.

作者信息

Carson Eric W, Anisko Eva M, Restrepo Cesar, Panariello Robert A, O'Brien Stephen J, Warren Russell F

机构信息

Resurgens Orthopaedics, PC, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2004 Jul;17(3):127-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248210.

Abstract

A retrospective study was performed to determine the etiology of failed primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and evaluate the clinical results of revision ACL surgery. From January 1989 to January 1996, 90 patients with failed ACL reconstructions underwent revision ACL surgery. The etiology of failed ACL reconstruction included 47 surgical technical errors, 22 traumatic reinjuries, 7 lack of graft incorporation, 3 loss of motion, 3 related to synthetic grafts, and 8 alignment or combined ligamentous instability patterns not addressed. Of 52 revision ACL patients with minimum 2-year follow-up, 43 responded to a questionnaire and underwent a comprehensive physical examination. The Hospital for Special Surgery knee ligament evaluation revealed 63% good/excellent results. Objective laxity test revealed 77% of all patients had 0/+1 grade on Lachman and a mean 2.86-mm KT 1000. The overall results of revision ACL surgery are encouraging in providing symptomatic relief and restoring stability; however, they are significantly lower than primary ACL surgery.

摘要

进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定初次前交叉韧带(ACL)重建失败的病因,并评估ACL翻修手术的临床结果。1989年1月至1996年1月,90例ACL重建失败的患者接受了ACL翻修手术。ACL重建失败的病因包括47例手术技术失误、22例创伤性再损伤、7例移植物未融合、3例活动度丧失、3例与合成移植物相关,以及8例未处理的对线或合并韧带不稳定模式。在52例接受至少2年随访的ACL翻修患者中,43例回复了问卷并接受了全面的体格检查。特种外科医院膝关节韧带评估显示,63%的结果为良好/优秀。客观松弛度测试显示,所有患者中有77%在拉赫曼试验中为0/+1级,KT 1000平均为2.86毫米。ACL翻修手术在缓解症状和恢复稳定性方面的总体结果令人鼓舞;然而,它们明显低于初次ACL手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验