Vouros Ioannis, Aristodimou Elena, Konstantinidis Antonis
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Oct;31(10):908-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00583.x.
Comparison of two bioabsorbable barriers (collagen and polylactic acid (PLA) membranes) combined with a bovine bone mineral (BBM) graft, with an access flap procedure (AFP) alone for treating intrabony defects.
Thirty-four subjects participated in this prospective, controlled clinical trial. Baseline clinical examination (probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL)) of selected sites was performed 2 months after completion of conservative treatment in conjunction with hard-tissue measurements to ascertain the depth of the defect (cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the defects). After randomly dividing patients into three groups (two membrane groups, one control group), full thickness flaps were elevated and exposed root surfaces planed before filling defects with bone graft and positioning a barrier membrane covering the defect. The control group was treated identically except for the barrier and bone graft placement. Clinical treatment outcomes were finally evaluated 12 months after surgery for changes of PD and CAL. Radiographs at baseline and 12 months were compared using non-standardized digital radiography.
A mean reduction in PD value of 5.08 mm and mean CAL gain of 4.39 mm occurred in the collagen-BBM group. Corresponding values for the PLA-BBM group were 4.72 and 3.71 mm, while access flap procedure (AFP) sites produced values of 2.50 and 2.43 mm. All improvements in clinical parameters were statistically significant (p<0.001) within groups for all variables. Both membranes produced statistically greater PD reduction and CAL gain compared with AFP treatment (p<0.05). Comparison between barrier groups failed to reveal any statistically significant difference in probing pocket depth reduction (p=0.56) or in CAL gain (p=0.34).
Placement of the two barrier membranes used in the present study in combination with BBM graft significantly improved clinical and radiographic parameters of deep intrabony pockets and proved superior to access flap alone.
比较两种生物可吸收屏障(胶原蛋白和聚乳酸(PLA)膜)联合牛骨矿物质(BBM)移植与单纯采用翻瓣手术(AFP)治疗骨内缺损的效果。
34名受试者参与了这项前瞻性对照临床试验。在保守治疗完成2个月后,对选定部位进行基线临床检查(探诊深度(PD)、临床附着水平(CAL)),同时进行硬组织测量以确定缺损深度(釉牙骨质界至缺损底部)。将患者随机分为三组(两个膜组,一个对照组),在填充骨移植材料并放置覆盖缺损的屏障膜之前,掀起全厚瓣并平整暴露的根面。对照组除不放置屏障膜和骨移植材料外,治疗方式相同。术后12个月最终评估临床治疗效果,观察PD和CAL的变化。使用非标准化数字射线摄影比较基线和12个月时的X线片。
胶原蛋白 - BBM组的PD值平均降低5.08 mm,CAL平均增加4.39 mm。PLA - BBM组的相应值为4.72和3.71 mm,而翻瓣手术(AFP)部位的相应值为2.50和2.43 mm。所有组内临床参数的改善在所有变量中均具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。与AFP治疗相比,两种膜在PD降低和CAL增加方面均具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。屏障膜组之间在探诊袋深度降低(p = 0.56)或CAL增加(p = 0.34)方面未发现任何统计学显著差异。
本研究中使用的两种屏障膜与BBM移植联合使用可显著改善深部骨内袋的临床和影像学参数,且证明优于单纯翻瓣手术。