• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成本效益分析在医疗保健资源分配决策中的应用:成本效益阈值预计将如何形成?

Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making: how are cost-effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge?

作者信息

Eichler Hans-Georg, Kong Sheldon X, Gerth William C, Mavros Panagiotis, Jönsson Bengt

机构信息

Vienna Center for Pharmaceutical Policy, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Value Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;7(5):518-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75003.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75003.x
PMID:15367247
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of health-care systems, both public and private, such as managed-care organizations, are adopting results from cost-effectiveness (CE) analysis as one of the measures to inform decisions on allocation of health-care resources. It is expected that thresholds for CE ratios may be established for the acceptance of reimbursement or formulary listing.

OBJECTIVE

This paper provides an overview of the development of and debate on CE thresholds, reviews threshold figures (i.e., cost per unit of health gain) currently proposed for or applied to resource-allocation decisions, and explores how thresholds may emerge.

DISCUSSION

At the time of this review, there is no evidence from the literature that any health-care system has yet implemented explicit CE ratio thresholds. The fact that some government agencies have utilized results from CE analysis in pricing/reimbursement decisions allows for retrospective analysis of the consistency of these decisions. As CE analysis becomes more widely utilized in assisting health-care decision-making, this may cause decision-makers to become increasingly consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

When CE analysis is conducted, well-established methodology should be used and transparency should be ensured. CE thresholds are expected to emerge in many countries, driven by the need for transparent and consistent decision-making. Future thresholds will likely be higher in most high-income countries than currently cited rules of thumb.

摘要

背景

越来越多的医疗保健系统,包括公共和私人的,如管理式医疗组织,正在采用成本效益(CE)分析的结果作为为医疗资源分配决策提供信息的措施之一。预计可能会为报销或列入药品目录设定CE比率阈值。

目的

本文概述了CE阈值的发展及相关争论,回顾了目前为资源分配决策提议或应用的阈值数字(即每单位健康收益的成本),并探讨了阈值可能如何出现。

讨论

在本次综述时,文献中没有证据表明任何医疗保健系统已经实施了明确的CE比率阈值。一些政府机构在定价/报销决策中利用CE分析结果这一事实,使得可以对这些决策的一致性进行回顾性分析。随着CE分析在协助医疗保健决策中得到更广泛的应用,这可能会使决策者越来越趋于一致。

结论

进行CE分析时,应使用成熟的方法并确保透明度。由于需要透明和一致的决策,预计CE阈值将在许多国家出现。在大多数高收入国家,未来的阈值可能会高于目前引用的经验法则。

相似文献

1
Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making: how are cost-effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge?成本效益分析在医疗保健资源分配决策中的应用:成本效益阈值预计将如何形成?
Value Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;7(5):518-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75003.x.
2
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs): the silence of the lambda.增量成本效益比(ICERs):拉姆达的沉默。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 May;62(9):2091-100. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.023. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
3
Generalised cost-effectiveness analysis: an aid to decision making in health.广义成本效益分析:健康决策的辅助工具。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2002;1(2):89-95.
4
Building uncertainty into cost-effectiveness rankings: portfolio risk-return tradeoffs and implications for decision rules.将不确定性纳入成本效益排名:投资组合风险-回报权衡及其对决策规则的影响。
Med Care. 2000 May;38(5):460-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200005000-00003.
5
The role of economic evidence in Canadian oncology reimbursement decision-making: to lambda and beyond.经济证据在加拿大肿瘤学报销决策中的作用:从拉姆达到更远。
Value Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):771-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00298.x. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis and formulary decision making in England: findings from research.英国的成本效益分析与处方集决策制定:研究结果
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(10):2116-29. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.009. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
7
Decision makers' views on health care objectives and budget constraints: results from a pilot study.决策者对医疗保健目标和预算限制的看法:一项试点研究的结果
Health Policy. 2004 Oct;70(1):33-48. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.01.009.
8
Are pricing and reimbursement decision-making criteria aligned with public preferences regarding allocation principles in the Polish healthcare sector?波兰医疗保健部门的定价和报销决策标准是否与公众在分配原则方面的偏好一致?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Oct;14(5):751-62. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.940903. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
9
Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue.公共医疗资源分配与救援原则。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jul;34(7):540-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021790.
10
Applying rapid 'de-facto' HTA in resource-limited settings: experience from Romania.在资源有限的情况下应用快速“事实上”的卫生技术评估:来自罗马尼亚的经验。
Health Policy. 2013 Oct;112(3):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for patients with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in China.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗与安慰剂联合化疗用于中国既往未治疗的局部复发性不可切除或转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 22;16:1654177. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1654177. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-effectiveness of biomarker-directed toripalimab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung-cancer in China.在中国,生物标志物导向的托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗用于既往未治疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 24;20(7):e0328730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328730. eCollection 2025.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of glofitamab versus rituximab for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in China.在中国复发或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中,戈利妥单抗与利妥昔单抗的成本效益分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01912-4.
4
The cost-effectiveness of interventions used for the screening, diagnosis and management of anaemia in pregnancy: A systematic review.孕期贫血筛查、诊断及管理干预措施的成本效益:一项系统评价
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 24;5(4):e0004392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004392. eCollection 2025.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Serplulimab Combined with Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin Compared to Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin Alone as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China.在中国,斯鲁利单抗联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇加卡铂与单纯白蛋白结合型紫杉醇加卡铂作为晚期鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗方案的成本效益分析。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Apr 15;18:1309-1321. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S506976. eCollection 2025.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of eribulin versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma.艾日布林与达卡巴嗪治疗晚期脂肪肉瘤患者的成本效益分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):2084. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84247-w.
7
Economic burden of multiple sclerosis in an Italian cohort of patients on disease-modifying therapy: analysis of disease cost and its components.意大利接受疾病修正治疗的多发性硬化症患者队列的经济负担:疾病成本及其构成分析。
J Neurol. 2024 Dec 12;272(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12729-y.
8
Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Tunisia: a modelling study.突尼斯人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的成本效益:一项建模研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):e085462. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085462.
9
A roadmap towards implementing health technology assessment in Oman.实现阿曼卫生技术评估的路线图。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Jul 12;38(9):241-257. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2024-0012.
10
Global bibliometric analysis of cost effectiveness analysis in healthcare research from 2013 to 2023.2013年至2023年医疗保健研究中成本效益分析的全球文献计量分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Sep 16;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00576-7.