Suppr超能文献

利培酮与奥氮平治疗慢性精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的疗效与成本:马尔可夫模型

Outcomes and costs of risperidone versus olanzapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders: a Markov model.

作者信息

Vera-Llonch Montserrat, Delea Thomas E, Richardson Erin, Rupnow Marcia, Grogg Amy, Oster Gerry

机构信息

Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Brookline, MA 02445, USA.

出版信息

Value Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;7(5):569-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75008.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare expected outcomes and costs of care in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders who are treated with risperidone versus olanzapine.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to examine outcomes and costs of care in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders receiving risperidone or olanzapine. The time frame of interest was 1 year. The model focused particular attention on the likelihood of therapy switching and discontinuation as a result of treatment-emergent side effects, as the efficacy of these two agents is similar. Measures of interest included the incidence of relapse and selected side effects including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), prolactin-related disorders and diabetes, expected change in body weight, and the percentage of patients remaining on initial therapy at the end of 1 year. Costs of antipsychotic therapy and psychiatric and nonpsychiatric services also were examined.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the rate of EPS was estimated to be slightly higher for risperidone, as was the incidence of symptomatic prolactin-related disorders. The expected incidence of diabetes mellitus, while low, was slightly higher for olanzapine. Approximately 25% and 4% of olanzapine and risperidone patients, respectively, were projected to experience an increase in body weight > or = 7%. The estimated percentage of patients remaining on initial therapy at the end of 1 year was higher for risperidone than olanzapine (76.9% vs. 45.6%, respectively). Expected mean total costs of care per month of therapy were $2163 for risperidone and $2316 for olanzapine. Results from sensitivity analyses suggest that the probability of therapy discontinuation following weight gain >5 kg would have to be lower than 0.1 for the number of patients remaining on therapy at the end of 1 year to be the same for risperidone and olanzapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with risperidone, treatment with olanzapine may result in greater increases in body weight, higher rates of therapy discontinuation, and higher costs of medical-care services.

摘要

目的

比较接受利培酮与奥氮平治疗的慢性精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的预期治疗结果和护理成本。

方法

构建一个马尔可夫模型,以研究接受利培酮或奥氮平治疗的慢性精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的治疗结果和护理成本。研究的时间范围为1年。由于这两种药物的疗效相似,该模型特别关注因治疗中出现的副作用而导致治疗转换和停药的可能性。研究的指标包括复发率和选定的副作用,如锥体外系症状(EPS)、催乳素相关疾病和糖尿病、预期体重变化,以及1年末仍接受初始治疗的患者百分比。还研究了抗精神病治疗以及精神科和非精神科服务的成本。

结果

在1年时,利培酮的EPS发生率估计略高,有症状的催乳素相关疾病的发生率也是如此。糖尿病的预期发生率虽然较低,但奥氮平的发生率略高。预计分别约有25%的奥氮平患者和4%的利培酮患者体重增加≥7%。利培酮组在1年末仍接受初始治疗的患者估计百分比高于奥氮平组(分别为76.9%和45.6%)。利培酮治疗每月的预期平均总护理成本为2163美元,奥氮平为2316美元。敏感性分析结果表明,体重增加>5 kg后停药的概率必须低于0.1,1年末接受治疗的患者数量才会在利培酮和奥氮平之间相同。

结论

与利培酮相比,奥氮平治疗可能导致体重增加更多、治疗停药率更高以及医疗服务成本更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验