• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西圣保罗在尸体肾分配中对儿童的优先考虑:所采用的策略

Priority for children in cadaveric kidney sharing: the strategy adopted in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

作者信息

Koch Nogueira Paulo C, Amaral Alexandre S R, Boni Reginaldo, Pereira Luiz A, Pinheiro Machado Paula G, Pestana Jose O M

机构信息

Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Santos, Centro Universitário Lusíada-UNILUS, Rua Coronel Lisboa 600, Vila Mariana, São Paulo, Brazil-CEP 04020-041.

出版信息

Pediatr Transplant. 2004 Oct;8(5):502-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00207.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00207.x
PMID:15367288
Abstract

Early kidney transplantation is crucial in order to accomplish both optimal mental development and the best adult height in children with end-stage renal disease. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the child priority policy for cadaveric kidney sharing adopted in the State of Sao Paulo (Brazil). We performed a retrospective study of data collected by the Government Transplant Department in São Paulo, involving all patients included in the waiting list from August 13, 1998 to December 31, 2001. During the study period, the child priority policy had been changed giving: period A--from the outset up to March 14, 2001, where the rule was to direct cadaveric kidneys obtained from children <12 yr, to recipients <12 yr; period B--from March 14, 2001 onwards, where the policy had been broadened to include cadaveric donors <18 yr, destined for recipients <18 yr. We performed the analysis of the data comprising 8940 patients, 8622 being adults (mean age = 48.6 +/- 14.1 yr, 3594 females) and 318 children (mean age = 11.9 +/- 5.1 yr, 156 females). Over the 3.5-yr follow-up there were 1964 deaths [1933 adults and 31 children, odds ratio (OR) 0.37; 95% CI 0.25-0.55], 1032 living donor kidney transplants (963 adults and 69 children, OR 2.20; 95% CI 1.66-2.93), and 556 cadaveric kidney transplants (444 adults and 112 children, OR 10.11; 95% CI 7.75-12.94). Three and a half years after being enrolled on the list, 24% of the children and 75% of the adults, respectively, were still awaiting a cadaveric kidney transplant (log rank test = 539, p < 0.00001). The analysis of period A vs. period B, suggests that the raising of the inclusion age upper limit to 18 yr, resulted in a twofold increase in the percentage of children being grafted within 6 months of enrollment. Overall, our data shows a slow rate of cadaveric kidney transplantation activity in Sao Paulo. Children's chances of receiving a living donor kidney almost doubled. Moreover, 19.5% of pediatric recipients had received their kidney within the first year of being enrolled on the waiting list. The scheme adopted in Sao Paulo is encouraging, but the results remain less favorable than those observed in other countries. The adoption of the priority policy did not result in an unacceptable increase of adult waiting time, given that the number of adults on our waiting list outweighs by far the number of children.

摘要

早期肾移植对于终末期肾病患儿实现最佳智力发育和达到最佳成人身高至关重要。目的是评估巴西圣保罗州采用的儿童优先尸体肾分配政策的效果。我们对圣保罗州政府移植部门收集的数据进行了回顾性研究,纳入了1998年8月13日至2001年12月31日等待名单上的所有患者。在研究期间,儿童优先政策发生了变化:A期——从开始到2001年3月14日,规定是将12岁以下儿童捐献的尸体肾分配给12岁以下的受者;B期——从2001年3月14日起,政策扩大到包括18岁以下尸体供者的肾,分配给18岁以下的受者。我们对8940例患者的数据进行了分析,其中8622例为成年人(平均年龄 = 48.6±14.1岁,女性3594例),318例为儿童(平均年龄 = 11.9±5.1岁,女性156例)。在3.5年的随访中,有1964例死亡[1933例成年人和31例儿童,比值比(OR)0.37;95%可信区间(CI)0.25 - 0.55],1032例活体供肾移植(963例成年人和69例儿童,OR 2.20;95%CI 1.66 - 2.93),以及556例尸体肾移植(444例成年人和112例儿童,OR 10.11;95%CI 7.75 - 12.94)。列入等待名单三年半后,分别有24%的儿童和75%的成年人仍在等待尸体肾移植(对数秩检验 = 539,p < 0.00001)。A期与B期的分析表明,将纳入年龄上限提高到18岁,使儿童在登记后6个月内接受移植的百分比增加了两倍。总体而言,我们的数据显示圣保罗尸体肾移植活动的速度较慢。儿童接受活体供肾的机会几乎增加了一倍。此外,19.5%的儿科受者在列入等待名单的第一年内就接受了肾脏。圣保罗采用的方案令人鼓舞,但结果仍不如其他国家观察到的那样理想。鉴于我们等待名单上成年人的数量远远超过儿童数量,采用优先政策并没有导致成年人等待时间出现不可接受的增加。

相似文献

1
Priority for children in cadaveric kidney sharing: the strategy adopted in Sao Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗在尸体肾分配中对儿童的优先考虑:所采用的策略
Pediatr Transplant. 2004 Oct;8(5):502-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00207.x.
2
Acute myocardial infarction and kidney transplantation.急性心肌梗死与肾移植
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Mar;17(3):900-7. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005090984. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
3
Allocation of deceased donor kidneys in São Paulo, Brazil: effect of human leukocyte antigen compatibility on graft survival.巴西圣保罗已故供体肾脏的分配:人类白细胞抗原相容性对移植物存活的影响。
Transplant Proc. 2009 Jan-Feb;41(1):93-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.10.051.
4
Kidney transplantation in the United States.美国的肾脏移植
Clin Transpl. 2008:1-18.
5
Renal transplantation in children with lupus nephritis.狼疮性肾炎患儿的肾移植
Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Feb;41(2):455-63. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2003.50056.
6
Model for end-stage liver disease: impact of the new deceased donor liver allocation policy in São Paulo, Brazil.终末期肝病模型:巴西圣保罗新的脑死亡供体肝脏分配政策的影响
Transplant Proc. 2009 Jan-Feb;41(1):226-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.09.059.
7
Variant techniques for liver transplantation in pediatric programs.儿科项目中肝脏移植的变异技术。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Dec;18(6):372-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038900. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
8
Predictors of vascular access thrombosis among patients on the cadaveric renal transplantation waiting list.尸体肾移植等待名单上患者血管通路血栓形成的预测因素。
Transplant Proc. 2006 Mar;38(2):413-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.01.022.
9
Attitude of kidney patients on the transplant waiting list toward related-living donation. A reason for the scarce development of living donation in Spain.等待肾移植患者对亲属活体捐赠的态度。西班牙活体捐赠发展不足的一个原因。
Clin Transplant. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(6):719-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00541.x.
10
The OPTN/UNOS Renal Transplant Registry.器官获取与移植网络/美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处
Clin Transpl. 2005:1-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Does graft mass impact on pediatric kidney transplant outcomes?移植肾体积对小儿肾移植结局有影响吗?
Pediatr Nephrol. 2014 Feb;29(2):297-304. doi: 10.1007/s00467-013-2637-y.