Helgason Asgeir R, Tomson Tanja, Lund Karl E, Galanti Rosaria, Ahnve Staffan, Gilljam Hans
Stockholm Centre of Public Health, Centre for Tobacco Prevention, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur J Public Health. 2004 Sep;14(3):306-10. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/14.3.306.
Studies indicate that shortage of cessation counsellors may be a major barrier for tobacco prevention among physicians. Telephone helplines (quitlines) may be an option. The effectiveness of the Swedish quitline and factors related to abstinence from smoking 12 months after the first contact were assessed.
Subjects included 694 smokers calling a reactive (no contact initiated by the counsellors) and 900 smokers calling a proactive (four or five contacts initiated by the counsellors after the first call) quitline for smoking cessation. The subjects were followed up 12 months after the first call using a mailed questionnaire assessing current abstinence, stages of change and factors potentially related to abstinence rates.
The questionnaire was returned by 70% of the subjects. Women receiving the proactive treatment reported 34% abstinence rates compared with 27% for those receiving the reactive treatment (p=0.03). For men the abstinence rates were 27% and 28%, respectively (p=0.80). Factors significantly related to abstinence in the adjusted analysis included no nicotine use at base-line, the adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval being 6.4 (2.1-19.4), additional support from a health care professional 3.5 (1.0-12.3), additional social support 3.1 (1.6-6.1), stress or depressive mood 2.7 (1.6-4.7), nicotine replacement therapy for five weeks or more 2.1 (1.1-4.0), and exposure to second-hand smoke 1.9 (1.1-3.3). The use of oral tobacco did not significantly increase current abstinence.
Quitlines are effective as an adjunct to the health care system. For women a proactive treatment may be more effective than a reactive treatment.
研究表明,戒烟咨询人员短缺可能是医生开展烟草预防工作的主要障碍。电话热线(戒烟热线)可能是一种解决办法。本研究评估了瑞典戒烟热线的效果以及首次联系后12个月戒烟的相关因素。
研究对象包括694名拨打反应式(咨询人员未主动联系)戒烟热线和900名拨打主动式(首次通话后咨询人员进行4或5次联系)戒烟热线的吸烟者。首次通话12个月后,通过邮寄问卷对研究对象进行随访,问卷内容包括当前戒烟情况、行为改变阶段以及可能与戒烟率相关的因素。
70%的研究对象回复了问卷。接受主动式治疗的女性报告的戒烟率为34%,而接受反应式治疗的女性为27%(p=0.03)。男性的戒烟率分别为27%和28%(p=0.80)。校正分析中与戒烟显著相关的因素包括基线时未使用尼古丁,校正比值比及95%置信区间为6.4(2.1 - 19.4);来自医疗保健专业人员的额外支持,3.5(1.0 - 12.3);额外的社会支持,3.1(1.6 - 6.1);压力或抑郁情绪,2.7(1.6 - 4.7);尼古丁替代疗法使用5周或更长时间,2.1(1.1 - 4.0);以及接触二手烟,1.9(1.1 - 3.3)。使用口用烟草并未显著提高当前戒烟率。
戒烟热线作为医疗保健系统的辅助手段是有效的。对于女性而言,主动式治疗可能比反应式治疗更有效。