Sistla G, Hogrefe C, Hao W, Ku J Y, Zalewsky E, Henry R F, Civerolo K
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York 12233, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2004 Aug;54(8):950-9. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470964.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1997 revised the 1-hr ozone (O3) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) to one based on an 8-hr average, resulting in potential nonattainment status for substantial portions of the eastern United States. The regulatory process provides for the development of a state implementation plan that includes a demonstration that the projected future O3 concentrations will be at or below the NAAQS based on photochemical modeling and analytical techniques. In this study, four photochemical modeling systems, based on two photochemical models, Community Model for Air Quality and the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with extensions, and two emissions processing models, Sparse Matrix Optimization Kernel for Emissions and Emissions Modeling System, were applied to the eastern United States, with emphasis on the northeastern Ozone Transport Region in terms of their response to oxides of nitrogen and volatile organic carbon-focused controls on the estimated design values. With the 8-hr O3 NAAQS set as a bright-line test, it was found that a given area could be termed as being in or out of attainment of the NAAQS depending upon the modeling system. This suggests the need to provide an estimate of model-to-model uncertainty in the relative reduction factor (RRF) for a better understanding of the uncertainty in projecting the status of an area's attainment. Results indicate that the model-to-model differences considered in this study introduce
1997年,美国环境保护局将1小时臭氧(O3)国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS)修订为基于8小时平均值的标准,这导致美国东部大部分地区可能出现未达标的情况。监管程序要求制定一项州实施计划,其中包括通过光化学建模和分析技术证明预计未来的O3浓度将达到或低于NAAQS。在本研究中,基于两种光化学模型(空气质量社区模型和扩展综合空气质量模型)以及两种排放处理模型(排放稀疏矩阵优化内核和排放建模系统)的四个光化学建模系统被应用于美国东部,重点是东北臭氧传输区域,以评估它们对氮氧化物和挥发性有机碳控制措施的响应,这些控制措施针对估计的设计值。将8小时O3 NAAQS作为明确的测试标准后发现,根据建模系统的不同,给定区域可能被判定为达标或未达标。这表明需要对相对减排因子(RRF)中的模型间不确定性进行估计,以便更好地理解预测区域达标状况时的不确定性。结果表明,本研究中考虑的模型间差异引入了