Li Ronald C, Tang Mei C
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Nov;54(5):904-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh435. Epub 2004 Sep 16.
The effects of mode, sequence and interval of antibiotic exposure on the post-antibiotic effect (PAE) induced by rifampicin and tobramycin were studied using Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 as the test organism.
In triplicate, baseline PAEs were evaluated by exposing E. coli to rifampicin and tobramycin individually and simultaneously for 1 h. PAEs were further assessed in a second study, with the organism exposed first to rifampicin for 1 h, followed by a second 1 h tobramycin exposure, commencing at the beginning, middle and end of the PAE phase induced by rifampicin. The third study was similar to the above, but with the sequence of the two antibiotics reversed, i.e. tobramycin then rifampicin.
The PAE produced by simultaneous exposure of the combination showed an apparent additive interaction (PAE: 5.0+/-0.3 h) when compared with the PAE of individual antibiotics (rifampicin alone: 3.0+/-0.1 h; tobramycin alone: 1.5+/-0.1 h). However, an antagonistic interaction was observed in the second study, with a more pronounced degree of antagonism at the beginning, dissipating towards the end of the previous rifampicin PAE (PAE at the beginning: 2.6+/-0.3 h; the middle: 1.5+/-0.2 h; and at the end: 1.7+/-0.3 h). By subtracting the residual contribution from the first rifampicin exposure, the net average PAEs attributed to the second tobramycin exposure actually increased, from -0.4 to 1.7 h from the beginning to the end of the rifampicin PAE. For the third study, an additive interaction was again observed when the organism was exposed to tobramycin first (PAE at the beginning: 4.7+/-0.4 h; the middle: 3.7+/-0.7 h; and at the end: 3.1+/-0.4 h). The timing of the second rifampicin exposure had no impact to the interaction; after correction, the net mean PAEs attributed to the second rifampicin exposure were maintained at 3.2, 3.2 and 3.1 h.
The present data suggest that the expression of interaction type on PAE by an antibiotic combination was dependent on the mode, sequence and interval of exposure. The impact of these variables should not be overlooked when clinical dosing regimens are optimized.
以大肠埃希菌ATCC 25922作为受试菌,研究抗生素暴露的方式、顺序和间隔对利福平与妥布霉素诱导的抗生素后效应(PAE)的影响。
一式三份,通过将大肠埃希菌分别单独及同时暴露于利福平和妥布霉素1小时来评估基线PAE。在第二项研究中进一步评估PAE,受试菌先暴露于利福平1小时,然后在利福平诱导的PAE阶段开始、中间和结束时再次暴露于妥布霉素1小时。第三项研究与上述相似,但两种抗生素的顺序颠倒,即先妥布霉素后利福平。
与单独使用抗生素的PAE(单独使用利福平:3.0±0.1小时;单独使用妥布霉素:1.5±0.1小时)相比,同时暴露于两种抗生素产生的PAE显示出明显的相加相互作用(PAE:5.0±0.3小时)。然而,在第二项研究中观察到拮抗相互作用,在开始时拮抗程度更明显,在先前利福平PAE结束时减弱(开始时PAE:2.6±0.3小时;中间:1.5±0.2小时;结束时:1.7±0.3小时)。通过减去第一次利福平暴露的残留影响,归因于第二次妥布霉素暴露的净平均PAE实际上增加了,从利福平PAE开始时的-0.4小时增加到结束时的1.7小时。对于第三项研究,当受试菌先暴露于妥布霉素时再次观察到相加相互作用(开始时PAE:4.7±0.4小时;中间:3.7±0.7小时;结束时:3.1±0.4小时)。第二次利福平暴露的时间对相互作用没有影响;校正后,归因于第二次利福平暴露的净平均PAE维持在3.2、3.2和3.1小时。
目前的数据表明,抗生素组合对PAE的相互作用类型的表达取决于暴露的方式、顺序和间隔。在优化临床给药方案时,不应忽视这些变量的影响。