Tamura M N, Fuse S, Azuma H, Hasebe M
Botanical Gardens, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, 2000 Kisaichi, Katano-shi, Osaka 576-0004, Japan.
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2004 Sep;6(5):562-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-821278.
In order to specify phylogenetic positions of the genera of Tofieldiaceae (Tofieldia, Triantha, Pleea, Harperocallis, Isidrogalvia), and to suggest reasonable circumscription of the family and genera of Tofieldiaceae, we determined DNA sequences of matK and rbcL for each genus of the family, and analyzed them phylogenetically with the 45 families and 113 genera of the monocots other than Tofieldiaceae, whose matK and rbcL sequences have already been reported. We found that Tofieldia, Triantha, Pleea, and Harperocallis form the same clade, which receives 100% bootstrap support. This clade can be regarded as corresponding to Tofieldiaceae, and is embedded in the clade of Alismatales (98%). On the other hand, Isidrogalvia is not included in this Tofieldiaceae clade, and positioned as sister to Narthecium (100%), embedded in the clade of Nartheciaceae (Dioscoreales) (100%). In the Tofieldiaceae, Pleea first diverges from the remaining three genera (100%), and then, Harperocallis diverges from the Tofieldia- Triantha complex (100%). In the Tofieldia- Triantha complex, five Tofieldia species form the same clade (100%), and two Triantha species form another clade (100%). Thus, Isidrogalvia should be transferred from Tofieldiaceae to Nartheciaceae. As Isidrogalvia, as well as the Nartheciaceae, have the carpels that are fully connate into a single style, Isidrogalvia fits the Nartheciaceae well with respect to carpel connation. After this transfer, the Tofieldiaceae correspond mainly to plants with almost free carpels and three styles. Pleea is better treated as an independent genus than included in Tofieldia. Triantha can be treated either as an independent genus or as congeneric with Tofieldia.
为了明确岩菖蒲科各属(岩菖蒲属、水麦冬属、岩菖蒲属、哈珀菖蒲属、伊西德罗菖蒲属)的系统发育位置,并提出对岩菖蒲科及其各属合理的界定,我们测定了该科各属的matK和rbcL基因序列,并与已报道matK和rbcL序列的45个科113个单子叶植物属进行了系统发育分析,这些单子叶植物属不包括岩菖蒲科。我们发现岩菖蒲属、水麦冬属、岩菖蒲属和哈珀菖蒲属形成了同一个分支,该分支得到了100%的自展支持。这个分支可被视为与岩菖蒲科相对应,并嵌套在泽泻目的分支中(98%)。另一方面,伊西德罗菖蒲属不包含在这个岩菖蒲科分支中,而是作为纳茜菜属的姐妹分支(100%),嵌套在纳茜菜科(薯蓣目)的分支中(100%)。在岩菖蒲科中,岩菖蒲属首先从其余三个属中分化出来(100%),然后,哈珀菖蒲属从岩菖蒲属 - 水麦冬属复合体中分化出来(100%)。在岩菖蒲属 - 水麦冬属复合体中,五个岩菖蒲属物种形成了同一个分支(100%),两个水麦冬属物种形成了另一个分支(100%)。因此,伊西德罗菖蒲属应从岩菖蒲科转移到纳茜菜科。由于伊西德罗菖蒲属以及纳茜菜科都具有完全合生为单一花柱的心皮,就心皮合生而言,伊西德罗菖蒲属与纳茜菜科非常契合。这次转移之后,岩菖蒲科主要对应于心皮几乎分离且具三个花柱的植物。岩菖蒲属作为一个独立属来处理比归入岩菖蒲属更好。水麦冬属既可以作为一个独立属来处理,也可以与岩菖蒲属归为同一属。