Suppr超能文献

高危女性无法吸出乳头溢液并不排除在随机乳晕周围细针穿刺标本中检测到细胞学异型性。

Failure of high risk women to produce nipple aspirate fluid does not exclude detection of cytologic atypia in random periareolar fine needle aspiration specimens.

作者信息

Sharma Priyanka, Klemp Jennifer R, Simonsen Marie, Welsko Chezna M, Zalles Carola M, Kimler Bruce F, Fabian Carol J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Sep;87(1):59-64. doi: 10.1023/B:BREA.0000041582.11586.d3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Evidence of hyperplasia with atypia found both on random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) and in nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) fluid are associated with an increased risk for breast cancer.

AIM

In this study, we report the correlation of NAF production with cytological assessment of ductal cells obtained by RPFNA.

METHODS

113 women at high risk for development of breast cancer attending the Breast Cancer Prevention Clinic at the University of Kansas Medical Center underwent a single NAF collection attempt and RPFNA.

RESULTS

NAF was successfully collected in 51% of women. There was no significant difference in age, 5-year Gail risk assessment, menopausal status, hormone use, family history of breast cancer, history of prior atypical hyperplasia/LCIS or history of contralateral DCIS/invasive breast cancer between women who produced NAF and those that did not. The only significant difference between the two groups was in history of prior lactation (p = 0.018). Twenty-seven of the 113 subjects were found to have hyperplasia with atypia by RPFNA was 31% in women who produced NAF versus 16% in those who did not (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Although prevalence of RPFNA atypia was numerically higher in NAF producers than non-producers the difference did not reach statistical significance. Failure to produce NAF does not exclude the presence of hyperplasia with atypia by random periareolar fine needle aspiration.

摘要

引言

在随机乳晕周围细针穿刺抽吸术(RPFNA)和乳头抽吸液(NAF)中发现的非典型增生证据与乳腺癌风险增加相关。

目的

在本研究中,我们报告了NAF产生与通过RPFNA获得的导管细胞细胞学评估之间的相关性。

方法

113名在堪萨斯大学医学中心乳腺癌预防诊所就诊的乳腺癌高危女性接受了单次NAF采集尝试和RPFNA。

结果

51%的女性成功采集到NAF。在产生NAF的女性和未产生NAF的女性之间,年龄、5年盖尔风险评估、绝经状态、激素使用、乳腺癌家族史、既往非典型增生/小叶原位癌病史或对侧导管原位癌/浸润性乳腺癌病史均无显著差异。两组之间唯一的显著差异在于既往哺乳史(p = 0.018)。113名受试者中有27名通过RPFNA被发现有非典型增生,在产生NAF的女性中为31%,而在未产生NAF的女性中为16%(p = 0.07)。

结论

尽管RPFNA非典型增生的患病率在产生NAF的女性中在数值上高于未产生者,但差异未达到统计学意义。未能产生NAF并不排除通过随机乳晕周围细针穿刺抽吸存在非典型增生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验