Giamarellos-Bourboulis Evangelos J, Koussoulas Vassilios, Panagou Charalambos, Adamis Theodoros, Baziaka Fotini, Skiadas Ioannis, Perrea Despina, Dionyssiou-Asteriou Amalia, Giamarellou Helen
4th Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens 124 64, Greece.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Oct;24(4):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.03.025.
In order to clarify whether susceptible and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa differ in the mechanism of induction of sepsis, three different isolates were used; one susceptible (isolate A) and two (isolates B and C) multidrug-resistant. Isolate B had moderately elevated MICs of antipseudomonal antimicrobials and isolate C highly elevated MICs. Each isolate was infused by a catheter inserted into the right jugular vein of six rabbits. Survival was recorded; blood was sampled at regular time intervals for estimation of bacterial blood counts, malondialdehyde (MDA) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha). Quantitative cultures of various organs were performed after death or sacrifice. Mean survival after challenge by isolates A, B and C was 0.73, 2.58 and 11.00 days, respectively (P of comparisons A versus B, 0.0048; A versus C, 0.0012; B versus C, 0.0005). The number of viable organisms in the blood after challenge using isolates A and B was greater than the viable counts of C. Serum MDA was lower after challenge with B and C compared with A. Serum TNFalpha levels were higher after challenge by isolate A compared with isolate C. The bacterial loads of the liver, lower right lung lobe, spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes were greater after challenge by isolate A than the other isolates. It is concluded that infection by multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa is accompanied by increased survival compared with infection by susceptible isolates; that finding might be explained by the different mechanisms leading to sepsis. Further studies must be done to clarify the significance of these observations for therapeutics.
为了阐明敏感和多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌在败血症诱导机制上是否存在差异,使用了三种不同的分离株;一种敏感株(分离株A)和两种多重耐药株(分离株B和C)。分离株B的抗假单胞菌抗菌药物的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)中度升高,分离株C的MIC高度升高。将每种分离株通过插入六只兔子右颈静脉的导管注入。记录存活情况;定期采集血液样本以估计细菌血计数、丙二醛(MDA)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNFα)。在死亡或处死后对各种器官进行定量培养。分离株A、B和C攻击后的平均存活时间分别为0.73天、2.58天和11.00天(A与B比较的P值为0.0048;A与C比较的P值为0.0012;B与C比较的P值为0.0005)。使用分离株A和B攻击后血液中的活菌数量大于分离株C的活菌计数。与分离株A相比,用分离株B和C攻击后血清MDA较低。与分离株C相比,分离株A攻击后血清TNFα水平较高。分离株A攻击后肝脏、右下肺叶、脾脏和肠系膜淋巴结的细菌载量大于其他分离株。得出的结论是,与敏感分离株感染相比,多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染伴随着存活率的提高;这一发现可能由导致败血症的不同机制来解释。必须进行进一步的研究以阐明这些观察结果对治疗的意义。