Treatment of CML in pediatric patients: should imatinib mesylate (STI-571, Gleevec) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant be front-line therapy?

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival of pediatric patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) receiving myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from fully-matched related and unrelated donors has been reported between 60 and 75%, but is associated with significant morbidity. Imatinib mesylate (STI-571, Gleevec) and reduced intensity conditioning stem cell transplantation (RIC) are two promising new tools that offer potential for decreasing therapy associated morbidity for patients with CML.

RESULTS

Large trials have shown significant responses in chronic phase patients treated with imatinib and reasonable but short-lived responses in advanced phase CML. Data from adult studies is beginning to define populations likely to progress or have prolonged responses to imatinib, and some adult treatment paradigms are moving toward reserving transplantation until patients are at risk of failure with imatinib. Early trials of RIC transplantation in CML show decreased transplant related morbidity with efficacy similar to conventional transplantation, but the approach has yet to be verified in phase III studies. Data in pediatric patients with imatinib and RIC transplantation is limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies with imatinib are underway in pediatrics, but whether pediatric dosing schemes will lead to outcomes similar to adults is unknown. Because HLA-matched myeloablative transplantation offers a high rate of cure in the pediatric population, clinical studies assessing the role of imatinib mesylate and RIC transplantation should be planned carefully in order to avoid sub-optimal outcomes.