Suppr超能文献

布地奈德/福莫特罗单吸入器用于轻至中度哮喘的维持治疗和缓解:一项随机双盲试验

Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler for maintenance and relief in mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomized, double-blind trial.

作者信息

Rabe Klaus F, Pizzichini Emilio, Ställberg Björn, Romero Santiago, Balanzat Ana M, Atienza Tito, Lier Per Arve, Jorup Carin

机构信息

University of Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.

University Hospital of Florianópolis, Florianópolis, Brazil.

出版信息

Chest. 2006 Feb;129(2):246-256. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.2.246.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare a novel asthma management strategy--budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler for both maintenance therapy and symptom relief--with a higher dose of budesonide plus as-needed terbutaline.

METHODS

This was a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (n = 697; mean age, 38 years [range, 11 to 79 years]; mean baseline FEV1, 75% of predicted; mean inhaled corticosteroid [ICS] dosage, 348 microg/d). Following a 2-week run-in period, all patients received two blinded, dry powder inhalers, one containing maintenance medication and one containing medication to be used as needed for the relief of symptoms. Patients were randomized to receive either budesonide/formoterol (80 microg/4.5 microg, two inhalations qd) for maintenance plus additional inhalations as needed for symptom relief, or budesonide (160 microg, two inhalations qd) for maintenance medication plus terbutaline (0.4 mg) as needed. The primary efficacy variable was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF).

RESULTS

Patients receiving budesonide/formoterol showed greater improvements in morning PEF than patients receiving budesonide (increases of 34.5 L/min vs 9.5 L/min, respectively; p < 0.001). The risk of having a severe exacerbation (hospitalization/emergency department [ED] treatment, oral steroids for asthma, or a > or = 30% decrease from baseline in morning PEF on 2 consecutive days) was 54% lower with budesonide/formoterol vs budesonide (p = 0.0011). Budesonide/formoterol patients experienced 90% fewer hospitalizations/ED treatments due to asthma than budesonide patients (1 vs 10, respectively; p = 0.026). The increased efficacy with budesonide/formoterol was achieved with less ICS than was used in the budesonide group (mean dose, 240 microg/d vs 320 microg/d, respectively) and with 77% fewer oral steroid treatment days vs budesonide (114 days vs 498 days, respectively). Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance and relief improves asthma control with a lower steroid load compared with a higher dose of budesonide plus terbutaline.

摘要

研究目的

比较一种新型哮喘管理策略——布地奈德/福莫特罗单一吸入器用于维持治疗和症状缓解——与高剂量布地奈德加按需使用的特布他林。

方法

这是一项为期6个月的随机、双盲、平行组研究,纳入轻度至中度哮喘患者(n = 697;平均年龄38岁[范围11至79岁];平均基线第一秒用力呼气容积[FEV1]为预测值的75%;平均吸入性糖皮质激素[ICS]剂量为348μg/天)。经过2周的导入期后,所有患者均收到两个盲法干粉吸入器,一个装有维持用药,另一个装有按需用于缓解症状的药物。患者被随机分为接受布地奈德/福莫特罗(80μg/4.5μg,每日两次吸入)用于维持治疗并按需额外吸入以缓解症状,或布地奈德(160μg,每日两次吸入)用于维持用药并按需使用特布他林(0.4mg)。主要疗效变量为早晨呼气峰值流速(PEF)。

结果

接受布地奈德/福莫特罗的患者早晨PEF改善程度大于接受布地奈德的患者(分别增加34.5L/分钟和9.5L/分钟;p < 0.001)。与布地奈德相比,使用布地奈德/福莫特罗发生严重加重(住院/急诊科[ED]治疗、哮喘口服类固醇或连续两天早晨PEF较基线下降≥30%)的风险降低了54%(p = 0.0011)。布地奈德/福莫特罗组因哮喘住院/ED治疗的次数比布地奈德组少90%(分别为1次和10次;p = 0.026)。与布地奈德组相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗组以更少的ICS剂量(平均剂量分别为240μg/天和320μg/天)和少77%的口服类固醇治疗天数(分别为114天和498天)实现了疗效增加。两种治疗的耐受性均良好。

结论

与高剂量布地奈德加特布他林相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗用于维持治疗和缓解治疗可改善哮喘控制,且类固醇负荷更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验