Merry C J, Sizemore C W, Franks J R
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Ear Hear. 1992 Feb;13(1):11-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199202000-00005.
Realistically evaluating the effectiveness of hearing protectors continues to be a major problem in hearing conservation. The purpose of this study was to examine a laboratory-based fitting procedure (User Fit) that was designed to yield hearing protector attenuation values similar to that derived from field studies. Ten subjects who were naive to hearing protectors were used in a repeated measures design that measured real ear attenuation at threshold for two types of plugs. Each subject was tested in two fitting conditions that varied based on the type and degree of assistance given to the subjects by the experimenter. The results showed significant differences in attenuation based on the fitting procedure used, with the User Fit best approximating field data. In addition, a generalized learning effect was noted. The results suggest that any experience with earplugs leads to subsequent improvement in attenuation despite the type of earplug used. Further testing is planned with greater numbers of subjects and additional types of hearing protectors.
切实评估听力保护器的有效性仍是听力保护领域的一个主要问题。本研究的目的是检验一种基于实验室的适配程序(用户适配),该程序旨在得出与现场研究所得结果相似的听力保护器衰减值。在一项重复测量设计中,选取了10名不熟悉听力保护器的受试者,测量了两种耳塞在阈值时的真耳衰减。每位受试者在两种适配条件下接受测试,这两种条件根据实验者给予受试者的帮助类型和程度而有所不同。结果表明,根据所使用的适配程序,衰减存在显著差异,其中用户适配最接近现场数据。此外,还观察到一种普遍的学习效应。结果表明,尽管使用的耳塞类型不同,但佩戴耳塞的任何经验都会导致后续衰减的改善。计划进行更多受试者和更多类型听力保护器的进一步测试。