Moskal N L, Goldstein D P
Department of Audiology and Speech Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Ear Hear. 1992 Feb;13(1):46-54.
In probe tube measures, the method used to equalize the sound field will determine the reference value used in calculating real ear insertion gain (REIG) and real ear aided gain (REAG). Several equalization methods are available with current probe tube systems. This study determined the effects of three equalization methods (substitution, modified comparison, and ipsilateral comparison) on REIG and REAG measures using open and closed earmolds for ear canals varying in circumference. Twelve subjects were selected representing a wide range of ear canal circumferences. Results revealed significant differences for REIG and REAG among the three equalization methods. These differences appear to be due to the different acoustic components included or excluded for each method. The results of this study suggest that the sound field equalization method used for probe tube measures needs to be considered when interpreting the hearing aid gain reported among various probe microphone units. Also, canal circumference may be a quick method for categorizing canal cavity size and appears to influence measured hearing aid gain.
在探管测量中,用于使声场均衡的方法将决定计算真耳插入增益(REIG)和真耳助听增益(REAG)时所使用的参考值。当前的探管系统有几种均衡方法可供使用。本研究确定了三种均衡方法(替代法、改良比较法和同侧比较法)对使用开放式和封闭式耳模的不同耳道周长的REIG和REAG测量结果的影响。选取了12名代表广泛耳道周长范围的受试者。结果显示,三种均衡方法之间的REIG和REAG存在显著差异。这些差异似乎是由于每种方法所包含或排除的不同声学成分所致。本研究结果表明,在解释不同探管麦克风单元报告的助听器增益时,需要考虑用于探管测量的声场均衡方法。此外,耳道周长可能是一种对耳道腔大小进行分类的快速方法,并且似乎会影响测量的助听器增益。