Cholesterol oxidase susceptibility of cholesterol and 5-androsten-3 beta-ol in pure sterol monolayers and in mixed monolayers containing 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine.

This study has examined the importance of the isocaproic side chain at C-17 of cholesterol to sterol/phospholipid interactions in monolayer membranes and to the cholesterol oxidase-susceptibility of cholesterol in pure and mixed monolayers at the air/water interface. The interactions between cholesterol or 5-androsten-3 beta-ol (which lacks the C-17 side chain) and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) in monolayers indicated that 5-androsten-3 beta-ol was not very efficient in causing condensation of the monolayer packing of POPC. Whereas cholesterol condensed the packing of POPC at all molar fractions examined (i.e., 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 with regard to POPC), 5-androsten-3 beta-ol caused a slight condensing effect on POPC packing only in the equimolar mixture. The mean molecular area requirement of 5-androsten-3 beta-ol (in pure sterol monolayers at different lateral surface pressures) was 2.2-6.7% less than that observed for cholesterol. The pure 5-androsten-3 beta-ol monolayer also collapsed at lower lateral surface pressures compared with the pure cholesterol monolayer (34 mN/m and 45 mN/m, respectively). The cholesterol oxidase (Streptomyces sp.) catalyzed oxidation of cholesterol or 5-androsten-3 beta-ol in pure monolayers in the air/water interface (10 mN/m) proceeded with very similar rates, indicating that the enzyme did not recognize that the C-17 side chain of 5-androsten-3 beta-ol was missing. The oxidation of cholesterol or 5-androsten-3 beta-ol in mixed POPC-containing monolayers (equimolar mixture) also revealed similar reaction rates, although the reaction was slower in the mixed monolayer compared with the pure sterol monolayer. When the oxidation of cholesterol and 5-androsten-3 beta-ol was examined by monitoring the production of H2O2 (the sterol was solubilized in 2-propanol and the assay conducted in phosphate buffer), the maximal reaction rate observed with 5-androsten-3 beta-ol was only about 41% of that measured with cholesterol. From the cholesterol oxidase point-of-view, it can be concluded that the enzyme did not recognize the C-17 side chain of cholesterol (or lack of it in 5-androsten-3 beta-ol), when the sterol was properly oriented as a monolayer at the air/water interface. However, when the substrate was presented to the enzyme in a less controlled orientation (organic solvent in water), 5-androsten-3 beta-ol may have oriented itself unfavorably compared with the orientation of cholesterol, thereby leading to slower oxidation rates.