Sanchez D, Grieve D W
Department of Anatomy, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, UK.
Ergonomics. 1992 Jan;35(1):49-64. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967797.
Static lifting strengths of nine men and nine women were measured at six heights from just above the floor to just above the head, at two horizontal reaches from the mid-ankles (equal to the elbow to grip and acromium to grip distances), in the sagittal plane and also at 45 degrees and 90 degrees to the right for two-handed exertions and at 45 degrees and 90 degrees to each side for one-handed exertions, making a total of 96 postures. A second and different group of 18 subjects (nine men and nine women) were studied in 20 two-handed and 40 one-handed postures intermediate to those of the first group. A third group of 16 subjects (eight men and eight women), with six drawn from the other groups, were used to determine maximum possible reach (at which lifting strength is zero) at the same heights and planes as those for the first group. When strength was expressed as a fraction of body weight and height and reach were expressed as fractions of stature, predictive equations of static lifting strength were obtained which were gender free. The predictive equations may be used to generate isodyne contours for an individual in any chosen planes. Individuals exist whose strengths are consistently greater or less than the prediction. The possibility of identifying such persons in a process of worker selection is discussed.
对9名男性和9名女性的静态举重力量进行了测量,测量高度从略高于地面到略高于头顶,共6个高度;水平伸展距离从中脚踝处起算,有两个距离(分别等于肘部到握力点和肩峰到握力点的距离),在矢状面内测量,对于双手用力,还在身体右侧45度和90度方向测量,对于单手用力,在身体两侧45度和90度方向测量,总共96种姿势。对另一组18名受试者(9名男性和9名女性)进行了研究,研究了20种双手姿势和40种单手姿势,这些姿势介于第一组姿势之间。第三组16名受试者(8名男性和8名女性),其中6名来自其他组,用于确定在与第一组相同的高度和平面上的最大可能伸展距离(此时举重力量为零)。当力量表示为体重的分数,高度和伸展距离表示为身高的分数时,得到了与性别无关的静态举重力量预测方程。这些预测方程可用于生成任何选定平面上个体的等力线轮廓。存在力量始终大于或小于预测值的个体。文中讨论了在工人选拔过程中识别这类人的可能性。