• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.

作者信息

Fothergill D M, Grieve D W, Pinder A D

机构信息

Naval Medical Research Institute, CODE 522, Bethesda, MD 20889-5607, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;72(5-6):430-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00242272.

DOI:10.1007/BF00242272
PMID:8925813
Abstract

Dynamic lifting strength was assessed at lift velocities ranging from 0 to 1 m.s-1 using a hydrodynamometer in which the viscous resistance to motion could be preset. Nine men and nine women performed one- and two-handed dynamic exertions against low, medium, and high resistances. The subjects were required to lift as forcefully and as fast as possible from a height of 400 mm to just above head height. The instantaneous forces recorded at knee, knuckle, hip, shoulder, elbow, and head heights were compared with those obtained during maximal one- and two-handed isometric lifts performed at the same heights. The position of peak force relative to stature was lower for one-handed lifts (35.9% of stature) than for two-handed lifts (38.4% of stature) (P < 0.005), but was unaffected by lift resistance (P > 0.05) and subject sex (P > 0.05). Lifting forces during two-handed exertions were on average 1.5 times greater than for one-handed exertions (P < 0.0001). However, the difference in the strength of one- and two-handed lifts was highly dependent on hand height (P < 0.0001) and task resistance (P < 0.005), and was greater for the men than for the women (P < 0.001). When static lifting strength was measured at heights relative to stature and normalized by dividing by body weight, there was no significant difference in performance between the men and the women [mean normalized female:male: (f:m) strength ratio = 0.76, P > 0.05]. Under dynamic conditions the sex difference in lifting performance was pronounced (mean normalized f:m strength ratio = 0.68, P < 0.01), especially for power output (mean f:m power.unit body weight-1 ratio = 0.52, P < 0.005). The proportion of generality (r2 x 100) between dynamic and static lifting strength was found to range between 63% and 87%. These data suggest that the dynamic and static tests of lifting strength measured a common, intrinsic ability to produce maximal lifting forces. The finding that sex differences in strength are dependent on whether the exertion is static or dynamic has important implications for biomechanical models of human strength.

摘要

相似文献

1
The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;72(5-6):430-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00242272.
2
Human strength capabilities during one-handed maximum voluntary exertions in the fore and aft plane.单手在前-后平面进行最大自主用力时的人体力量能力。
Ergonomics. 1991 May;34(5):563-73. doi: 10.1080/00140139108967337.
3
Peak lifting velocities of men and women for the reduced inertia squat exercise using force control.使用力控制进行的减少惯性深蹲练习中男性和女性的峰值提升速度。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Feb;102(3):299-305. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0585-6. Epub 2007 Oct 13.
4
One versus two-handed lifting and lowering: lumbar spine loads and recommended one-handed limits protecting the lower back.单手和双手抬升/降低:腰椎负荷和保护下背部的单手负重限制建议。
Ergonomics. 2020 Apr;63(4):505-521. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1727023. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
The measurement and prediction of isometric lifting strength in symmetrical and asymmetrical postures.对称和不对称姿势下等长提升力量的测量与预测。
Ergonomics. 1992 Jan;35(1):49-64. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967797.
6
Determination of maximum acceptable and comfortable height during one-handed lifting.单手搬运时最大可接受高度和舒适高度的测定。
Work. 2020;65(3):497-507. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203104.
7
Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes.对称和不对称平面中不同伸展距离下的静态和动态提升力。
Ergonomics. 1992 Jul-Aug;35(7-8):861-80. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967367.
8
Spinal compression at peak isometric and isokinetic exertions in simulated lifting in symmetric and asymmetric planes.在对称和不对称平面模拟举重过程中,等长和等速用力峰值时的脊柱压缩情况。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1996 Jul;11(5):281-289. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(96)00015-0.
9
Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.周期性举重任务中的肌肉疲劳及与疲劳相关的生物力学变化
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 15;28(16):1810-20. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000087500.70575.45.
10
Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.不对称动态和等长举重对力量/力以及自觉用力程度评级的影响。
Ergonomics. 1996 Jun;39(6):862-76. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964507.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of posture on power output generated in single pulling movements.姿势对单次拉伸动作中产生的功率输出的影响。
Appl Ergon. 1984 Jun;15(2):115-7. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(84)90283-7.
2
The relation between force and velocity in human muscle.人体肌肉中力与速度的关系。
J Physiol. 1949 Dec;110(3-4):249-80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004437.
3
Differences in activation patterns in elbow flexor muscles during isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions.等长收缩、向心收缩和离心收缩期间肘屈肌激活模式的差异。
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;66(3):214-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00235096.
4
Dynamic and static lifting capacity and muscular strength of steelmill workers.钢铁厂工人的动态和静态举重能力及肌肉力量。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1982 Nov;43(11):853-7. doi: 10.1080/15298668291410684.
5
Similarities and dissimilarities between static and dynamic exercise.静态运动和动态运动之间的异同。
Circ Res. 1981 Jun;48(6 Pt 2):I3-10.
6
An isoinertial technique to assess individual lifting capability.一种评估个体举重能力的等惯性技术。
Hum Factors. 1983 Oct;25(5):493-506. doi: 10.1177/001872088302500504.
7
Prediction of maximum loads in lifting from measurement of back muscle strength.通过测量背部肌肉力量预测提举时的最大负荷。
Prog Phys Ther. 1970;1(2):146-9.
8
A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing.一种静态肌肉力量测试的拟议标准程序。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1974 Apr;35(4):201-6. doi: 10.1080/0002889748507023.
9
A comparison of dynamic- and static-strength models for prediction of lifting capacity.用于预测起重能力的动态和静态强度模型比较。
Ergonomics. 1985 Oct;28(10):1409-17. doi: 10.1080/00140138508963267.
10
Electro-mechanical response times and rate of force development in males and females.男性和女性的机电反应时间及力量发展速率。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986 Feb;18(1):31-6.