Parashos Peter, Gordon Ian, Messer Harold H
School of Dental Science, University of Melbourne, 711 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
J Endod. 2004 Oct;30(10):722-5. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000129963.42882.c9.
This study examined used, discarded rotary nickel-titanium instruments obtained from 14 endodontists in four countries, and identified factors that may influence defects produced during clinical use. A total of 7,159 instruments were examined for the presence of defects. Unwinding occurred in 12% of instruments and fractures in 5% (1.5% torsional, 3.5% flexural). The defect rates varied significantly among endodontists. Instrument design factors also influenced defect rate, but to a lesser extent. The mean number of uses of instruments with and without defects was 3.3 +/- 1.8 (range: 1-10), and 4.5 +/- 2.0 (range: 1-16), respectively. The most important influence on defect rates was the operator, which may be related to clinical skill or a conscious decision to use instruments a specified number of times or until defects were evident.
本研究检查了从四个国家的14位牙髓病医生处获得的已使用过的、废弃的旋转镍钛器械,并确定了可能影响临床使用过程中产生缺陷的因素。共检查了7159件器械是否存在缺陷。12%的器械发生松解,5%的器械发生折断(1.5%为扭转折断,3.5%为弯曲折断)。牙髓病医生之间的缺陷率差异显著。器械设计因素也会影响缺陷率,但影响程度较小。有缺陷和无缺陷器械的平均使用次数分别为3.3±1.8次(范围:1 - 10次)和4.5±2.0次(范围:1 - 16次)。对缺陷率影响最大的是操作人员,这可能与临床技能或有意识地决定使用器械特定次数或直至出现缺陷有关。