Radke S, Wollmerstedt N, Bischoff A, Eulert J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, König-Ludwig Haus, Julius-Maximilians University Würzburg, Brettreichstr. 11, 97074, Würzburg, Germany,
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Apr;13(3):158-62. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0551-3. Epub 2004 Sep 24.
Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SON) is an osteonecrosis that mainly affects the medial femoral condyle. In endstage SON, knee arthroplasty is the therapy of choice. Because of the unicompartimental nature of the knee, unicondylar knee arthroplasty is considered an ideal implant for treatment of this condition. The purpose of this study was to prove that the long-term results of unicondylar implants are better than the results of bicondylar implants for the treatment of SON. All patients treated for SON between 1984 and 2000 have been recorded. Two groups were formed according to the implant used. In all patients the preoperative radiograph was analyzed according to stage and size of the osteonecrotic lesion and the osteoarthritic changes. Postoperatively, the Knee Society Score and the radiograph were recorded. Thirty-nine patients were included in this study, of which 23 patients were treated by a unicondylar implant and 16 by a bicondylar implant. On a short-term basis, unicondylar implants had better clinical results; however, on a long-term basis bicondylar implants were better. In comparison, only unicondylar implants had to be revised. Radiolucency lines were mainly observed in patients with unicondylar impants and large areas of osteonecrosis. Our long-term results suggest that patients with SON are better treated by bicondylar implants. The reasons for the higher failure rate for unicondylar implants are poor bone stock and secondary arthritic changes.
膝关节自发性骨坏死(SON)是一种主要影响股骨内侧髁的骨坏死。在SON终末期,膝关节置换术是首选治疗方法。由于膝关节的单髁性质,单髁膝关节置换术被认为是治疗这种疾病的理想植入物。本研究的目的是证明单髁植入物治疗SON的长期效果优于双髁植入物。记录了1984年至2000年间所有接受SON治疗的患者。根据所使用的植入物分为两组。对所有患者术前的X线片根据骨坏死病变的分期和大小以及骨关节炎变化进行分析。术后记录膝关节协会评分和X线片。本研究纳入了39例患者,其中23例接受单髁植入物治疗,16例接受双髁植入物治疗。短期内,单髁植入物的临床效果更好;然而,长期来看双髁植入物更好。相比之下,只有单髁植入物需要翻修。透亮线主要见于接受单髁植入物且骨坏死面积较大的患者。我们的长期结果表明,SON患者采用双髁植入物治疗效果更好。单髁植入物失败率较高的原因是骨量不足和继发性骨关节炎变化。