Van Hee Pim, Middelberg Anton P J, Van Der Lans Rob G J M, Van Der Wielen Luuk A M
Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, 2628 BC Delft, The Netherlands.
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Oct 5;88(1):100-10. doi: 10.1002/bit.20343.
The efficiency of physical separation of inclusion bodies from cell debris is related to cell debris size and inclusion body release and both factors should be taken into account when designing a process. In this work, cell disruption by enzymatic treatment with lysozyme and cellulase, by homogenization, and by homogenization with ammonia pretreatment is discussed. These disruption methods are compared on the basis of inclusion body release, operating costs, and cell debris particle size. The latter was measured with cumulative sedimentation analysis in combination with membrane-associated protein quantification by SDS-PAGE and a spectrophotometric peptidoglycan quantification method. Comparison of the results obtained with these two cell debris quantification methods shows that enzymatic treatment yields cell debris particles with varying chemical composition, while this is not the case with the other disruption methods that were investigated. Furthermore, the experiments show that ammonia pretreatment with homogenization increases inclusion body release compared to homogenization without pretreatment and that this pretreatment may be used to control the cell debris size to some extent. The enzymatic disruption process gives a higher product release than homogenization with or without ammonia pretreatment at lower operating costs, but it also yields a much smaller cell debris size than the other disruption process. This is unfavorable for centrifugal inclusion body purification in this case, where cell debris is the component going to the sediment and the inclusion body is the floating component. Nevertheless, calculations show that centrifugal separation of inclusion bodies from the enzymatically treated cells gives a high inclusion body yield and purity.
从细胞碎片中物理分离包涵体的效率与细胞碎片大小和包涵体释放有关,在设计工艺时应考虑这两个因素。在这项工作中,讨论了用溶菌酶和纤维素酶进行酶处理、匀浆以及氨预处理后匀浆的细胞破碎方法。基于包涵体释放、操作成本和细胞碎片粒径对这些破碎方法进行了比较。通过累积沉降分析结合SDS-PAGE膜相关蛋白定量和分光光度法肽聚糖定量方法测量细胞碎片粒径。对这两种细胞碎片定量方法所得结果的比较表明,酶处理产生的细胞碎片颗粒具有不同的化学组成,而其他所研究的破碎方法并非如此。此外,实验表明,与未预处理的匀浆相比,氨预处理结合匀浆可增加包涵体释放,并且这种预处理可在一定程度上用于控制细胞碎片大小。在较低的操作成本下,酶促破碎过程比有或没有氨预处理的匀浆产生更高的产物释放,但它产生的细胞碎片大小也比其他破碎过程小得多。在这种情况下,这对于离心法纯化包涵体是不利的,因为细胞碎片是沉降成分而包涵体是漂浮成分。然而,计算表明,从经酶处理的细胞中离心分离包涵体可获得高的包涵体产量和纯度。