Suppr超能文献

谵妄指数,一种衡量谵妄严重程度的指标:关于信度、效度和反应性的新发现。

The delirium index, a measure of the severity of delirium: new findings on reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

作者信息

McCusker Jane, Cole Martin G, Dendukuri Nandini, Belzile Eric

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Oct;52(10):1744-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52471.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of an instrument for measuring the severity of delirium, the Delirium Index (DI).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study, with repeated patient assessments at multiple points in the hospital, at 8 weeks after discharge, and at 6 and 12 months after admission.

SETTING

The medical services of a primary acute-care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Medical admissions aged 65 and older: 165 with delirium and dementia, 57 with delirium only, 55 with dementia only, and 41 with neither.

MEASUREMENTS

Severity of delirium symptoms was measured using the DI. Delirium was diagnosed using the Confusion Assessment Method. Other measures included the Mini-Mental State Examination, Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, Barthel Index (BI), premorbid instrumental activities of daily living, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Clinical Severity of Illness scale (CSI), and the Acute Physiology Score (APS).

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient of interrater reliability was 0.98. Two measures of fluctuation were significantly higher in patients with delirium than in those without delirium. At baseline, the DI was correlated with the BI, APS, and CSI in delirious patients with (correlation coefficient (r)=-0.43, 0.17, and 0.36, respectively) or without (r=-0.44, 0.39, 0.22, respectively) dementia. At 8 weeks, in delirious patients with and without dementia, internal responsiveness as measured by effect sizes was -0.60 and -0.74, respectively, and the standardized response mean for both groups was -0.64. Low to good levels of external responsiveness were found.

CONCLUSION

The DI appears to be a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of the severity of delirium, in patients with delirium, with or without dementia.

摘要

目的

评估一种用于测量谵妄严重程度的工具——谵妄指数(DI)的可靠性、有效性和反应性。

设计

前瞻性队列研究,在患者住院期间的多个时间点、出院后8周以及入院后6个月和12个月对患者进行重复评估。

设置

一家初级急性护理医院的医疗服务部门。

参与者

65岁及以上的内科住院患者:165例患有谵妄和痴呆,57例仅患有谵妄,55例仅患有痴呆,41例两者均无。

测量

使用DI测量谵妄症状的严重程度。采用谵妄评定法诊断谵妄。其他测量指标包括简易精神状态检查表、老年人认知功能下降知情者问卷、巴氏指数(BI)、病前日常生活工具性活动、查尔森合并症指数、临床疾病严重程度量表(CSI)和急性生理评分(APS)。

结果

评定者间可靠性的组内相关系数为0.98。谵妄患者的两种波动测量值显著高于无谵妄患者。在基线时,DI与患有(相关系数(r)分别为-0.43、0.17和0.36)或未患有(r分别为-0.44、0.39、0.22)痴呆的谵妄患者的BI、APS和CSI相关。在8周时,患有和未患有痴呆的谵妄患者,以效应量衡量的内部反应性分别为-0.60和-0.74,两组的标准化反应均值为-0.64。发现外部反应性处于低至良好水平。

结论

DI似乎是一种可靠、有效且具有反应性的测量谵妄严重程度的方法,适用于患有或未患有痴呆的谵妄患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验