Suppr超能文献

《谵妄评定量表修订版98》葡萄牙语版本:信度与效度

Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98: reliability and validity.

作者信息

de Negreiros Daniel Philippi, da Silva Meleiro Alexandrina Maria Augusto, Furlanetto Letícia M, Trzepacz Paula T

机构信息

Post-Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 May;23(5):472-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.1906.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity and the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98).

METHODS

The scale was translated into Portuguese and back-translated into English. After assessing its face validity, five diagnostic groups (n=64; delirium, depression, dementia, schizophrenia and others) were evaluated by two independent researchers blinded to the diagnosis. Diagnosis and severity of delirium as measured by the DRS-R-98 were compared to clinical diagnosis, Mini-Mental State Exam, Confusion Assessment Method, and Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI).

RESULTS

Mean and median DRS-R-98 total scores significantly distinguished delirium from the other groups (p<0.001). Inter-rater reliability (ICC between 0.9 and 1) and internal consistency (alpha=0.91) were very high. DRS-R-98 severity scores correlated highly with the CGI. Mean DRS-R-98 severity scores during delirium differed significantly (p<0.01) from the post-treatment values. The area under the curve established by ROC analysis was 0.99 and using the cut-off value of 20 the scale showed sensitivity and specificity of 92.6% and 94.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Portuguese version of the DRS-R-98 is a valid and reliable measure of delirium that distinguishes delirium from other disorders and is sensitive to change in delirium severity, which may be of great value for longitudinal studies.

摘要

目的

评估葡萄牙语版的《谵妄评定量表修订版98》(DRS-R-98)的有效性和可靠性。

方法

该量表被翻译成葡萄牙语,然后再回译成英语。在评估其表面效度后,由两名对诊断不知情的独立研究人员对五个诊断组(n = 64;谵妄、抑郁、痴呆、精神分裂症及其他)进行评估。将DRS-R-98所测量的谵妄诊断及严重程度与临床诊断、简易精神状态检查表、意识模糊评估方法及临床总体印象量表(CGI)进行比较。

结果

DRS-R-98总分的均值和中位数能够显著区分谵妄组与其他组(p < 0.001)。评分者间信度(组内相关系数在0.9至1之间)和内部一致性(α = 0.91)非常高。DRS-R-98严重程度评分与CGI高度相关。谵妄期间DRS-R-98严重程度评分均值与治疗后值有显著差异(p < 0.01)。ROC分析确定的曲线下面积为0.99,使用临界值20时,该量表的敏感性和特异性分别为92.6%和94.6%。

结论

葡萄牙语版的DRS-R-98是一种有效且可靠的谵妄测量工具,能够区分谵妄与其他疾病,并且对谵妄严重程度的变化敏感,这对于纵向研究可能具有重要价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验