Suppr超能文献

成本效益与证据评估作为覆盖政策的标准。

Cost-effectiveness and evidence evaluation as criteria for coverage policy.

作者信息

Garber Alan M

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-284-96. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w4.284.

Abstract

Private health plans and government health insurance programs in the United States base their coverage decisions on evidence criteria, rather than explicit cost-effectiveness criteria. As health spending continues to grow rapidly, however, approaches to coverage policy that ignore costs fail to meet the needs of consumers, employers, health plans, and federal and state governments. I describe the role of evidence-based criteria in formal coverage decision making and contrast the ways that these criteria differ from cost-effectiveness criteria. Finally, I discuss options for incorporating considerations of cost-effectiveness into coverage policy and other aspects of benefit design.

摘要

美国的私人健康保险计划和政府医疗保险项目在做出承保决策时依据的是证据标准,而非明确的成本效益标准。然而,随着医疗支出持续快速增长,忽视成本的承保政策方法无法满足消费者、雇主、健康保险计划以及联邦和州政府的需求。我阐述了基于证据的标准在正式承保决策中的作用,并对比了这些标准与成本效益标准的不同之处。最后,我讨论了将成本效益考量纳入承保政策及福利设计其他方面的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验