Wierzbicki M, Howard B J
Washburn University.
J Pers Assess. 1992 Feb;58(1):115-26. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5801_11.
We investigated the differential responding of 100 male inmates to subtle and obvious MCMI scale items; subtlety was determined by judgments by college students. It has been predicted that item subtlety would be positively correlated with item endorsement. This prediction was supported across all 175 MCMI items, as well as across items on 7 of 8 personality and 8 of 12 clinical scales. It had also been predicted that education and intelligence would moderate the relationship between subtlety and endorsement, with inmates higher in education and intelligence demonstrating a greater tendency than other inmates to avoid obvious items. Modest support was obtained for this prediction, with statistically significant results found for 4 personality and 5 clinical scales. The significance of the subtle-obvious distinction is discussed, especially when employing the MCMI with an inmate population.
我们调查了100名男性囚犯对明尼苏达多项人格问卷(MCMI)量表中细微和明显项目的不同反应;细微程度由大学生的判断来确定。据预测,项目的细微程度将与项目认可呈正相关。这一预测在所有175个MCMI项目中得到了支持,在8个人格量表中的7个以及12个临床量表中的8个项目中也得到了支持。还曾预测,教育程度和智力会调节细微程度与认可之间的关系,教育程度和智力较高的囚犯比其他囚犯更倾向于避免明显的项目。这一预测得到了适度支持,在4个人格量表和5个临床量表中发现了具有统计学意义的结果。讨论了细微与明显区分的重要性,特别是在对囚犯群体使用MCMI时。