Wierzbicki M
Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233.
J Clin Psychol. 1993 Nov;49(6):809-14. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199311)49:6<809::aid-jclp2270490608>3.0.co;2-s.
College students (N = 241) completed the MCMI under different instructional sets. An index of differential endorsement of subtle and obvious MCMI items was found to discriminate more strongly than the MCMI Validity Scale between subjects instructed to answer honestly and subjects instructed to fake good, fake bad, or portray specific forms of psychopathology. In addition, differential endorsement of subtle and obvious items on MCMI subscales tended to discriminate more strongly than the MCMI Validity Scale between subjects instructed to answer honestly and subjects instructed to portray the forms of psychopathology assessed by the subscales. The use of the subtle-obvious distinction to assess the validity of the MCMI is discussed.
241名大学生在不同的指导条件下完成了米隆临床多轴问卷（MCMI）。研究发现，一个关于对MCMI中细微和明显项目的差异认可指数，在被指导诚实地回答的受试者与被指导夸大优点、伪装不良或表现出特定形式精神病理学症状的受试者之间，比MCMI效度量表具有更强的区分能力。此外，在MCMI分量表上对细微和明显项目的差异认可，在被指导诚实地回答的受试者与被指导表现出分量表所评估的精神病理学形式的受试者之间，往往比MCMI效度量表具有更强的区分能力。本文讨论了使用细微与明显的差异来评估MCMI效度的问题。
