Suppr超能文献

多重聚合酶链反应、培养和血清学检测用于诊断百日咳博德特氏菌感染的比较

Comparison of multiplex polymerase chain reaction, culture, and serology for the diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection.

作者信息

Chia Ju-Hsin, Su Lin-Hui, Lin Pen-Yi, Chiu Cheng-Hsun, Kuo An-Jing, Sun Chien-Feng, Wu Tsu-Lan

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5, Fushing Street, Gueishan Shiang, Taoyuan, Taiwan 333, ROC.

出版信息

Chang Gung Med J. 2004 Jun;27(6):408-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection is difficult. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests are more sensitive than culture, but the reported sensitivity is variable. We prospectively compared the performance of culture, serology, and a multiplex PCR for the detection of B. pertussis.

METHODS

A total of 193 paired nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens were examined by both culture and a multiplex PCR. Serology results were available in 103 patients. Medical charts of the patients with discrepant laboratory findings were reviewed and compared with the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clinical case definition.

RESULTS

Of the 193 specimens, 11 were positive on both culture and PCR, and 14 were positive on PCR only. Of the 103 specimens with serology results, 3 were positive with all three methods, and 69 were negative with all methods. Eleven of the 14 PCR-positive only cases and 6 of the 19 serology-positive only cases were defined as true pertussis cases according to an expanded standard which includes either (1) culture positive or (2) PCR or serology positive with clinical features fulfilling the CDC clinical case definition and the patients having received macrolides treatment for more than 10 days. The sensitivity and specificity of the multiplex PCR were 79% and 98%, respectively, while those for serology were 47% and 85%, and for culture 39% and 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the superior sensitivity of the multiplex PCR in detection of B. pertussis, compared with conventional culture and serology. Clinical validation indicates that the multiplex PCR offers specific detection of B. pertussis from NP specimens.

摘要

背景

准确诊断百日咳博德特氏菌感染存在困难。聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测比培养法更敏感,但报道的敏感性存在差异。我们前瞻性地比较了培养法、血清学检测和多重PCR检测百日咳博德特氏菌的性能。

方法

对193对鼻咽拭子标本同时进行培养和多重PCR检测。103例患者有血清学检测结果。对实验室检查结果不一致的患者病历进行回顾,并与美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的临床病例定义进行比较。

结果

193份标本中,11份培养和PCR检测均为阳性,14份仅PCR检测为阳性。103份有血清学检测结果的标本中,3份三种方法检测均为阳性,69份三种方法检测均为阴性。根据一项扩展标准,14例仅PCR阳性病例中的11例和19例仅血清学阳性病例中的6例被定义为确诊百日咳病例,该标准包括以下二者之一:(1)培养阳性;(2)PCR或血清学检测阳性,且临床特征符合CDC临床病例定义,患者接受大环内酯类药物治疗超过10天。多重PCR的敏感性和特异性分别为79%和98%,血清学检测分别为47%和85%,培养法分别为39%和100%。

结论

我们的数据证实,与传统培养法和血清学检测相比,多重PCR检测百日咳博德特氏菌具有更高的敏感性。临床验证表明,多重PCR可从鼻咽标本中特异性检测百日咳博德特氏菌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验