Cengiz Ali Bülent, Yildirim Inci, Ceyhan Mehmet, Seçmeer Gülten, Gür Deniz, Kara Ateş
Infectious Disease Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Turk J Pediatr. 2009 Jul-Aug;51(4):309-16.
This prospective study, which was designed to compare nasopharyngeal culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serology in the diagnosis of pertussis, covered 35 children aged between 0 and 16 who were admitted to Hacettepe University Ihsan Doğramaci Children's Hospital between 1 March 2005 and 31 August 2006 with coughing for 7 days or longer, paroxysmal cough of any duration, or cough with inspiratory whoop and/or vomiting (or apnea) after coughs. The demographic data and vaccination history of the patients were recorded. During the initial examination, samples were taken from the posterior nasopharynx for Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis) culture and PCR analysis. In order to determine antibody positivity and antibody levels against B. pertussis antigens, serum samples were taken during the initial examination (acute phase) and two weeks later (convalescent phase). In the first serum sample, immunoglobulin M (IgM) was determined against pertussis toxin. In the first and second samples, IgA and IgG antibodies were evaluated against pertussis toxin and filamentous hemagglutinin. Culture yielded negative results in all of the patients. PCR was positive in two cases (5.7%). In the PCR-positive patients, IgM, IgA and IgG type anti-pertussis antibodies were found to be positive in the first serum samples, and IgA and IgG antibodies were found to be positive in the second serum samples. Therefore, it was considered that serology could be as sensitive as PCR when type IgM, IgA and IgG antibodies were found to be positive against a minimum of two antigens of B. pertussis. In conclusion, both PCR and serologic tests--if evaluating all types of antibodies to a minimum of two antigens of B. pertussis obtained in both acute and convalescent sera--could be more sensitive than culture in the diagnosis of pertussis.
这项前瞻性研究旨在比较鼻咽培养、聚合酶链反应(PCR)和血清学检测在百日咳诊断中的作用,研究对象为2005年3月1日至2006年8月31日期间因咳嗽7天及以上、阵发性咳嗽(持续时间不限)或咳嗽伴吸气性吼声和/或咳嗽后呕吐(或呼吸暂停)入住哈杰泰佩大学伊桑·多格拉马西儿童医院的35名0至16岁儿童。记录了患者的人口统计学数据和疫苗接种史。在初次检查时,从鼻咽后部采集样本进行百日咳博德特氏菌(B. pertussis)培养和PCR分析。为了确定针对B. pertussis抗原的抗体阳性情况和抗体水平,在初次检查时(急性期)和两周后(恢复期)采集血清样本。在第一份血清样本中,检测针对百日咳毒素的免疫球蛋白M(IgM)。在第一份和第二份样本中,评估针对百日咳毒素和丝状血凝素的IgA和IgG抗体。所有患者的培养结果均为阴性。PCR检测有两例呈阳性(5.7%)。在PCR检测呈阳性的患者中,第一份血清样本中IgM、IgA和IgG型抗百日咳抗体呈阳性,第二份血清样本中IgA和IgG抗体呈阳性。因此,当发现针对至少两种B. pertussis抗原的IgM、IgA和IgG型抗体呈阳性时,认为血清学检测可能与PCR检测一样敏感。总之,在百日咳诊断中,PCR检测和血清学检测——如果评估急性期和恢复期血清中针对至少两种B. pertussis抗原的所有类型抗体——可能比培养检测更敏感。