Gruen Russell L, Knox Stephanie, Carson Phillip, O'Rourke Ian C, Britt Helena, Bailie Ross S
Flinders University NT Clinical School, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2004 Oct;74(10):863-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03190.x.
Optimal planning for surgical training and the surgical workforce requires knowledge of the need and demand for surgical care in the community. This has previously relied on indirect indicators, such as hospital throughput. We aimed to describe referrals from general practitioners (GPs) to surgeons in Australia using a classification of surgical disorders developed especially for primary care settings.
Terms in the International Classification of Primary Care Version 2-Plus were reclassified into categories delineated by specialist surgeons, resulting in the Surgical Nosology In Primary-care Settings (SNIPS). Referrals to surgeons were analysed using data on 303,000 patient encounters by a random sample of 3030 GPs involved in the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) study.
Thirty-two per cent (143,013) of all problems were classified as potential surgical problems, of which 9.5% (13,570) were referred to surgeons at an overall rate of 44.8 referrals per 1000 GP encounters. Patients with surgical problems were significantly older than the overall general practice patient population. Women and patients with health care cards were significantly less likely than men and patients without health care cards to be referred when a surgical problem was managed by the GP. Forty-two per cent of all surgical referrals were accounted for by the following categories: skin lesions, skin infection/injury, upper gastrointestinal, breast lumps/cancer, spine, knee arthritis/pain, knee injury/instability, infective and non-infective ear disorders. Many commonly referred problems are usually managed as outpatients.
The data from this study may have application for surgical workforce planning and ensuring trainees receive adequate exposure to commonly referred conditions. The classification system (SNIPS) may be useful for future research concerning the interface between primary care and specialist surgical practice.
外科培训和外科医疗队伍的优化规划需要了解社区对外科护理的需求。此前这一直依赖于间接指标,如医院诊疗量。我们旨在使用专门为初级保健环境制定的外科疾病分类,描述澳大利亚全科医生(GP)向外科医生的转诊情况。
《国际初级保健分类第2版+》中的术语被重新分类为外科专科医生划定的类别,形成了初级保健环境中的外科疾病分类法(SNIPS)。通过参与改善健康评估与护理(BEACH)研究的3030名全科医生的随机样本,利用30.3万次患者诊疗数据,分析了向外科医生的转诊情况。
所有问题中有32%(143013例)被归类为潜在外科问题,其中9.5%(13570例)被转诊给外科医生,总体转诊率为每1000次全科医生诊疗44.8例。有外科问题的患者明显比普通全科诊疗患者群体年龄更大。当全科医生处理外科问题时,女性和持有医疗保健卡的患者被转诊的可能性明显低于男性和没有医疗保健卡的患者。所有外科转诊中有42%属于以下类别:皮肤病变、皮肤感染/损伤、上消化道疾病、乳腺肿块/癌症、脊柱疾病、膝关节关节炎/疼痛、膝关节损伤/不稳定、感染性和非感染性耳部疾病。许多常见的转诊问题通常作为门诊病例处理。
本研究的数据可能有助于外科医疗队伍规划,并确保实习生有足够机会接触常见的转诊病症。该分类系统(SNIPS)可能有助于未来关于初级保健与专科外科实践之间接口的研究。