Meyboom-de Jong B, Smith R J, Hiddema-van-der Wal A, van der Werf G T
Rijksuniversiteit, vakgroep Huisartsgeneeskunde, Groningen.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1996 Jul 20;140(29):1499-504.
To study the gatekeeper function of Dutch general practitioners (GPs) by investigating the relation between the referring GP, referrals, and referral cards. (In the Netherlands, it is customary that patients only see a specialist after referral by their GP. In this way the GP acts as a gatekeeper between primary and secondary care. Specialists are paid by the patient's insurance company which they send a so-called referral card stating the name of the referring GP.)
Descriptive.
Hospitals in Groningen and Hoogeveen and four general practices in the area.
The study questions were answered using data for 1993 of the computerized morbidity Registration Network Groningen (RNG) of the Department of Family Medicine of Groningen University and data of two regional health insurance companies (RZG and Het Groene Land).
For 1993 the RNG showed a referral-referral card ratio of 34%, ranging from 24% to 42% among different practices; and from 17-46% among the various specialties. For the surgical specialties, the range of indications for which patients were actively referred to the various specialties varied from 21-33 per 100 referrals, for the non-surgical specialties it ranged from 25 to 56 per 100 referrals. The number of referrals by the 'own' GP accounted for an average of three-quarters of the referral cards attributed to the own GP. The last five years the number of referrals varied showing no clear increase or decrease.
GPs appeared to have difficulty in acting as gatekeeper once patients were being treated by the specialist. In studies of referrals. research into specialists' follow-up strategies should be an integral part. A back referral or return card could facilitate this type of study.
通过调查转诊的全科医生、转诊情况和转诊卡之间的关系,研究荷兰全科医生的把关人功能。(在荷兰,惯例是患者只有在经其全科医生转诊后才能看专科医生。这样,全科医生就充当了初级保健和二级保健之间的把关人。专科医生由患者的保险公司支付费用,保险公司会发送一张所谓的转诊卡,上面注明转诊全科医生的姓名。)
描述性研究。
格罗宁根和霍赫芬的医院以及该地区的四家全科诊所。
利用格罗宁根大学家庭医学系的格罗宁根计算机化发病率登记网络(RNG)1993年的数据以及两家地区健康保险公司(RZG和Het Groene Land)的数据回答研究问题。
1993年,RNG显示转诊 - 转诊卡比例为34%,不同诊所之间的比例在24%至42%之间;不同专科之间的比例在17%至46%之间。对于外科专科,每100次转诊中患者被积极转诊至各专科的指征范围为21 - 33例,对于非外科专科,每100次转诊中该范围为25至56例。“自己的”全科医生的转诊数量平均占归属于该全科医生的转诊卡数量的四分之三。过去五年转诊数量有所变化,没有明显的增加或减少。
一旦患者由专科医生治疗,全科医生似乎难以充当把关人角色。在转诊研究中,对专科医生后续策略的研究应是不可或缺的一部分。反向转诊或回执卡有助于此类研究。