Suppr超能文献

减少救护车转运分流时间的社区试验:圣地亚哥县患者目的地试验

Community trial to decrease ambulance diversion hours: the San Diego county patient destination trial.

作者信息

Vilke Gary M, Castillo Edward M, Metz Marcelyn A, Ray Leslie Upledger, Murrin Patricia A, Lev Roneet, Chan Theodore C

机构信息

County of San Diego, Division of Emergency Medical Services, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;44(4):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.05.002.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Emergency department (ED) ambulance diversion is a major issue in many communities. When patients do not reach requested facilities, challenges in care are compounded by lack of available medical records and delays in transferring admitted patients back to the originally requested facility. We seek to evaluate a community intervention to reduce ambulance diversion.

METHODS

This was a community intervention in a county of 2.8 million individuals. Ambulance diversion guidelines were revised for all ambulance agencies and EDs. Participation by EDs was voluntary, and main outcome measures, which included ambulance transports, ambulance diversions, and bypass hours, were compared for the pretrial, trial, and posttrial periods.

RESULTS

A total of 235,766 patients were transported to an ED by advanced life support ambulance during the 2-year study period. There was a significant decrease in the number of patients who did not reach the requested facility because of ambulance diversion for the trial period (n=322) and posttrial period (n=449) compared with the pretrial period (n=1,320; -998 diverted patients per month [95% confidence interval (CI) -1,162 to -833 patients] and -871 diverted patients per month [95% CI -963 to -780 patients], respectively). There was also a significant decrease in average monthly hours on diversion for the trial period (n=1,079) and posttrial period (n=1,774) compared with the pretrial period (n=4,007; -2,928 hours on bypass [95% CI -3,936 to -1,919 hours on bypass] and -2,232 hours on bypass [95% CI -3,620 to -2,235 hours on bypass], respectively).

CONCLUSION

A voluntary community-wide approach to reducing hospital ED diversion and getting more ambulance patients to requested facilities was effective.

摘要

研究目的

急诊科救护车分流是许多社区面临的一个重大问题。当患者无法送达其请求前往的医疗机构时,由于缺乏可用的病历以及将住院患者转回最初请求的医疗机构存在延迟,护理工作面临的挑战会更加复杂。我们旨在评估一项减少救护车分流的社区干预措施。

方法

这是一项针对一个拥有280万人口的县的社区干预措施。所有救护车机构和急诊科都修订了救护车分流指南。急诊科的参与是自愿的,并且对审前、试验期和试验后期的主要结局指标进行了比较,这些指标包括救护车运送量、救护车分流情况和绕行时间。

结果

在为期2年的研究期间,共有235,766名患者通过高级生命支持救护车被送往急诊科。与审前期(n = 1,320)相比,试验期(n = 322)和试验后期(n = 449)因救护车分流而未送达请求医疗机构的患者数量显著减少(分别为每月减少998名分流患者[95%置信区间(CI) -1,162至-833名患者]和每月减少871名分流患者[95%CI -963至-780名患者])。与审前期(n = 4,007)相比,试验期(n = 1,079)和试验后期(n = 1,774)的平均每月分流时间也显著减少(分别为减少2,928小时的绕行时间[95%CI -3,936至-1,919小时的绕行时间]和减少2,232小时的绕行时间[95%CI -3,620至-2,235小时的绕行时间])。

结论

一种自愿的全社区范围内减少医院急诊科分流并使更多救护车患者能够送达请求医疗机构的方法是有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验